Unreasoned refusal of adjournment for contentious hearings quashed by HC; procedural fairness upheld.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – HC quashed impugned order dated 16 August 2024 passed by Assistant Commissioner u/s 73(9) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. HC held Assistant Commissioner took narrow, pedantic view in refusing adjournment withou

Unreasoned refusal of adjournment for contentious hearings quashed by HC; procedural fairness upheld.
Case-Laws
GST
HC quashed impugned order dated 16 August 2024 passed by Assistant Commissioner u/s 73(9) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. HC held Assistant Commissioner took narrow, pedantic view in refusing adjournment without assigning reasons, despite contestation regarding petitioner's participation in hearings. Petition allowed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Arbitrary GST Registration Cancellation Without Proper Notice Violates Natural Justice, HC Rules.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The HC held that the final order cancelling GST registration failed to record reasons supporting allegations in the show cause notice, violating natural justice principles. The authorities arbitrarily cancelled registration

Arbitrary GST Registration Cancellation Without Proper Notice Violates Natural Justice, HC Rules.
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that the final order cancelling GST registration failed to record reasons supporting allegations in the show cause notice, violating natural justice principles. The authorities arbitrarily cancelled registration retrospectively without indicating such intent in the notice. Consequently, the impugned cancellation order could not be sustained, and the petition was al

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Congress alleges slowdown in GST collections, asks govt to focus on complexities of economy

GST Dated:- 3-1-2025 PTI – News – Congress alleges slowdown in GST collections, asks govt to focus on complexities of economy Dated:- 3-1-2025 – New Delhi, Jan 3 (PTI) The Congress on Friday expressed concern over the “disappointing” latest GST numbers

Congress alleges slowdown in GST collections, asks govt to focus on complexities of economy
GST
Dated:- 3-1-2025
PTI
New Delhi, Jan 3 (PTI) The Congress on Friday expressed concern over the “disappointing” latest GST numbers and urged the government to focus on the complexities of the economy instead of imposing tax on popcorn.
In a statement on the latest GST numbers, Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh claimed India was locked in a “pernicious cycle of low consumption – low investment – low growth – low wages”.
He said, “The litany of demoralising news on the economic front from the deceleration in growth to the poor GST revenue collections demands that the government apparatus shift its focus

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Chewing tobacco products classified under higher GST slab, manufacturers' plea rejected.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The HC held that the petitioners’ chewing tobacco products are to be classified under Heading 2403 99 10 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, attracting a higher compensation cess of 160% under the GST (Compensation to States)

Chewing tobacco products classified under higher GST slab, manufacturers' plea rejected.
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that the petitioners' chewing tobacco products are to be classified under Heading 2403 99 10 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, attracting a higher compensation cess of 160% under the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017. The petitioners cannot change the classification merely for rate benefit. The Advance Rulings classifying the products under 2403 99 10 are binding. The f

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petitioner's reply to be considered before initiating tax recovery proceedings under GST Act.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. HC held Section 61(2) requires consideration of explanation furnished. Section 61(3) states if no satisfactory explanation is given, proper offi

Petitioner's reply to be considered before initiating tax recovery proceedings under GST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. HC held Section 61(2) requires consideration of explanation furnished. Section 61(3) states if no satisfactory explanation is given, proper officer may initiate action u/s 73. Initiation of proceeding u/s 73 was without jurisdiction. Impugned order quashed. Petitioner's reply dated 29.07.2021 to be deal

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Bombay HC sets aside tax order, grants petitioner time to pay Rs. 1 crore and file reply; orders tax authority to reassess after fair hearing.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Impugned order set aside by HC. Petitioner to remit Rs.1 crore within two weeks, submit reply within two weeks thereafter treating impugned order as show cause notice. Respondent authority to complete assessment in accordan

Bombay HC sets aside tax order, grants petitioner time to pay Rs. 1 crore and file reply; orders tax authority to reassess after fair hearing.
Case-Laws
GST
Impugned order set aside by HC. Petitioner to remit Rs.1 crore within two weeks, submit reply within two weeks thereafter treating impugned order as show cause notice. Respondent authority to complete assessment in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioner.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quic

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Improper service of show cause notices & order violates natural justice; 25% tax deposit required within 2 weeks.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Principles of natural justice violated as show cause notices and impugned order not served properly. Petitioner to deposit 25% disputed tax within two weeks. Impugned order treated as show cause notice, petitioner to submit

Improper service of show cause notices & order violates natural justice; 25% tax deposit required within 2 weeks.
Case-Laws
GST
Principles of natural justice violated as show cause notices and impugned order not served properly. Petitioner to deposit 25% disputed tax within two weeks. Impugned order treated as show cause notice, petitioner to submit objections with supporting documents within four weeks. HC disposed petition.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotatio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Bakery selling cakes, ice creams on premises qualifies as restaurant service, taxed 5% GST; goods like stickers, balloons taxed separately.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The AAAR held that the petitioner’s supply of cakes, bakery items, ice creams, chocolates, and other edible products prepared on the premises and supplied from the counter with facility to consume on air-conditioned premise

Bakery selling cakes, ice creams on premises qualifies as restaurant service, taxed 5% GST; goods like stickers, balloons taxed separately.
Case-Laws
GST
The AAAR held that the petitioner's supply of cakes, bakery items, ice creams, chocolates, and other edible products prepared on the premises and supplied from the counter with facility to consume on air-conditioned premises constitutes a composite supply of restaurant services, taxable at 5% GST without input tax credit. However, the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Leasing electric vehicles without operator classified under 'Financial & related services' by AAAR.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The AAAR held that leasing of electric vehicles (E-Bikes/EVs) without operator is classifiable under heading 9971 for Financial and related services under Sl. No. 15(ii) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT(R) dated 28.06.2017 as

Leasing electric vehicles without operator classified under 'Financial & related services' by AAAR.
Case-Laws
GST
The AAAR held that leasing of electric vehicles (E-Bikes/EVs) without operator is classifiable under heading 9971 for Financial and related services under Sl. No. 15(ii) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT(R) dated 28.06.2017 as amended. The rate of tax will be the same as applicable on supply of like goods involving transfer of title. The AAAR examined the Vehicle Lease Agreemen

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court rules forex gains on export sales are taxable turnover under state sales tax law.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – HC dismisses revision. Differential amount received by petitioner due to foreign exchange fluctuation constitutes “turnover” under KGST Act. Amount represents consideration for sale of goods despite exchange rate benefit. S

High Court rules forex gains on export sales are taxable turnover under state sales tax law.
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismisses revision. Differential amount received by petitioner due to foreign exchange fluctuation constitutes “turnover” under KGST Act. Amount represents consideration for sale of goods despite exchange rate benefit. Statutory definition of turnover encompasses such foreign currency amounts when converted to Indian rupees. Permissible deductions already granted, differential a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court remands GST case for fresh order on merits due to absence of statutory appellate tribunal.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – HC allowed petition by remanding case to pass fresh order on merits within 3 months. Appeal against order u/s 107 of CGST Act lies before GST Tribunal u/s 112, but Tribunal not yet constituted. HC struck down Circular 135/0

High Court remands GST case for fresh order on merits due to absence of statutory appellate tribunal.
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed petition by remanding case to pass fresh order on merits within 3 months. Appeal against order u/s 107 of CGST Act lies before GST Tribunal u/s 112, but Tribunal not yet constituted. HC struck down Circular 135/05-2020-GST dated 31.03.2020 on which impugned order based, following decisions of Guwahati, Calcutta, Rajasthan and Delhi HCs.
TMI Updates – Highlig

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petitioner allowed personal hearing on penalty for unloading goods without proper documentation chain.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The HC allowed the petitioner’s request for a personal hearing on 18.12.2024 at 11:00 am regarding the levy of penalty u/s 129(1)A of the CGST Act for unloading goods at an unauthorized location without proper documentation

Petitioner allowed personal hearing on penalty for unloading goods without proper documentation chain.
Case-Laws
GST
The HC allowed the petitioner's request for a personal hearing on 18.12.2024 at 11:00 am regarding the levy of penalty u/s 129(1)A of the CGST Act for unloading goods at an unauthorized location without proper documentation. The HC directed fresh orders to be passed after considering the petitioner's submissions. The petitioner can request provisional release of goods bef

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Timelines for Impounding Vehicles Violated, Proceedings Set Aside and Vehicle Release Ordered.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Petitioner challenged proceedings u/s 129(3) for failure to comply with mandatory timelines. Relying on TVL. UDHAYAN STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED, HC held impugned proceedings contravened Section 129 timelines, set aside proceedi

Timelines for Impounding Vehicles Violated, Proceedings Set Aside and Vehicle Release Ordered.
Case-Laws
GST
Petitioner challenged proceedings u/s 129(3) for failure to comply with mandatory timelines. Relying on TVL. UDHAYAN STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED, HC held impugned proceedings contravened Section 129 timelines, set aside proceedings, and directed vehicle bearing Registration No. TN-29-AB-7887 be released forthwith. Petition disposed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee,

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Punjab's revenue collection from VAT, CST, GST crosses Rs 30,000 crore in Apr-Dec: Cheema

GST Dated:- 2-1-2025 PTI – News – Punjab’s revenue collection from VAT, CST, GST crosses Rs 30,000 crore in Apr-Dec: Cheema Dated:- 2-1-2025 – Chandigarh, Jan 2 (PTI) Punjab Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema on Thursday said the state has, for the fi

Punjab's revenue collection from VAT, CST, GST crosses Rs 30,000 crore in Apr-Dec: Cheema
GST
Dated:- 2-1-2025
PTI
Chandigarh, Jan 2 (PTI) Punjab Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema on Thursday said the state has, for the first time, surpassed the Rs 30,000-crore mark in revenue collection as VAT, CST, GST, PSDT (state development tax), and excise in the first nine months of a fiscal year.
“In the current fiscal year, the total revenue received from these taxes up to December is Rs 31,156.31 crore, whereas in the fiscal year 2023-24, the total revenue collection from these taxes was Rs 27,927.31 crore,” Cheema said in an official statement here.
Cheema said the state has also witnessed a significant increase in its net GST

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Voucher trading not taxable under GST, but commission for agents & ancillary services like marketing are taxable; Unredeemed vouchers exempt.

Circulars – GST – Highlights – CBIC clarified that transactions in vouchers, whether recognized as pre-paid instruments by RBI or not, are neither supply of goods nor services. Trading of vouchers on principal-to-principal basis is not leviable to GST. H

Voucher trading not taxable under GST, but commission for agents & ancillary services like marketing are taxable; Unredeemed vouchers exempt.
Circulars
GST
CBIC clarified that transactions in vouchers, whether recognized as pre-paid instruments by RBI or not, are neither supply of goods nor services. Trading of vouchers on principal-to-principal basis is not leviable to GST. However, commission/fee earned by agents for distribution is taxable service. Additional services like advertisin

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Online suppliers & e-commerce operators must collect state details from unregistered buyers for tax invoice.

Circulars – GST – Highlights – The CBIC clarified that for online services supplied by suppliers or through e-commerce operators to unregistered recipients, irrespective of the supply value, the tax invoice must mandatorily mention the recipient’s state

Online suppliers & e-commerce operators must collect state details from unregistered buyers for tax invoice.
Circulars
GST
The CBIC clarified that for online services supplied by suppliers or through e-commerce operators to unregistered recipients, irrespective of the supply value, the tax invoice must mandatorily mention the recipient's state name. This state name shall be deemed the recipient's address on record for determining the place of supply u/s 12(2)(b)(i) of IGST Act as the re

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Registered recipient gets ITC when supplier delivers goods to transporter under ex-works contract, not actual receipt.

Circulars – GST – Highlights – As per clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of CGST Act, 2017, a registered person is deemed to have “received” goods when the supplier delivers them to a transporter at supplier’s premises under Ex-Works contract, e

Registered recipient gets ITC when supplier delivers goods to transporter under ex-works contract, not actual receipt.
Circulars
GST
As per clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of CGST Act, 2017, a registered person is deemed to have “received” goods when the supplier delivers them to a transporter at supplier's premises under Ex-Works contract, even though physical receipt may occur later at recipient's premises. ITC is available to recipient at time of such delivery by supplier

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification on Tax Liability and Input Tax Credit for E-Commerce Operators under GST.

Circulars – GST – Highlights – Electronic commerce operators (ECOs) required to pay tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act for specified services supplied through their platform are not required to reverse proportionate input tax credit on inputs and input services ut

Clarification on Tax Liability and Input Tax Credit for E-Commerce Operators under GST.
Circulars
GST
Electronic commerce operators (ECOs) required to pay tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act for specified services supplied through their platform are not required to reverse proportionate input tax credit on inputs and input services utilized for such supplies u/s 9(5). However, ECOs cannot utilize the input tax credit for discharging tax liability u/s 9(5) which must be paid in cash through electro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Exporters can claim refund of additional IGST paid due to export goods' price hike post-shipment: CBIC guidelines.

Circulars – GST – States – Highlights – The CBIC issued guidelines allowing exporters to claim refund of additional IGST paid due to upward revision in export goods’ prices after shipment. Exporters can file refund claim electronically on common portal u

Exporters can claim refund of additional IGST paid due to export goods' price hike post-shipment: CBIC guidelines.
Circulars
GST – States
The CBIC issued guidelines allowing exporters to claim refund of additional IGST paid due to upward revision in export goods' prices after shipment. Exporters can file refund claim electronically on common portal using Form GST RFD-01 under “Any other” category until dedicated category is enabled. The claim requires documents proving price revision, a

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

CBIC Sets 1% GST Valuation Rule for Corporate Guarantees Issued After Oct 26, 2023; Clarifies ITC and Co-guarantor Obligations.

Circulars – GST – States – Highlights – The CBIC has clarified the following key points regarding taxability and valuation of supply of services of providing corporate guarantee between related persons: Sub-rule (2) of Rule 28 of CGST Rules prescribing 1

CBIC Sets 1% GST Valuation Rule for Corporate Guarantees Issued After Oct 26, 2023; Clarifies ITC and Co-guarantor Obligations.
Circulars
GST – States
The CBIC has clarified the following key points regarding taxability and valuation of supply of services of providing corporate guarantee between related persons: Sub-rule (2) of Rule 28 of CGST Rules prescribing 1% valuation applies to corporate guarantees issued/renewed on or after 26.10.2023. For prior periods, valuation to be done as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

No Recovery of GST Dues for Now if Appeal Authority Not Constituted, Pay Pre-Deposit and File Undertaking.

Circulars – GST – States – Highlights – The CBIC issued guidelines regarding recovery of outstanding dues in cases where the first appellate authority has confirmed the demand, partially or fully, but appeals against such orders could not be filed due to

No Recovery of GST Dues for Now if Appeal Authority Not Constituted, Pay Pre-Deposit and File Undertaking.
Circulars
GST – States
The CBIC issued guidelines regarding recovery of outstanding dues in cases where the first appellate authority has confirmed the demand, partially or fully, but appeals against such orders could not be filed due to non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal. Taxpayers can pay the pre-deposit amount through the Electronic Liability Register and file an underta

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Businesses Face GST Registration Cancellation as Investigations into Alleged Bogus Firms Continue.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The HC held that although its previous order did not prescribe a specific timeline, the respondent submitted that inquiries into alleged bogus firms were ongoing, and an appropriate decision on cancellation of GST registrat

Businesses Face GST Registration Cancellation as Investigations into Alleged Bogus Firms Continue.
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that although its previous order did not prescribe a specific time

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Opportunity to respond to tax discrepancies, no indulgence: High Court clarifies procedural stance.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The HC held that the petitioner’s request for indulgence need not be granted as the communication dated 12.11.2024 merely afforded an opportunity of hearing after the respondents notified discrepancies. The petitioner can r

Opportunity to respond to tax discrepancies, no indulgence: High Court clarifies procedural stance.
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that the petitioner's request for indulgence need not be granted as the communication dated 12.11.2024 merely afforded an opportunity of hearing after the respondents notified discrepancies. The petitioner can respond to the discrepancies, including contentions u/s 67(1) of the KGST Act raised in the writ petition.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marqu

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Impugned GST Order Quashed for Lack of Proper Show Cause Notice, Violating Natural Justice Principles.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The HC quashed the impugned order for violating principles of natural justice by not providing proper show cause notice and opportunity of hearing u/ss 73 and 75(4) of CGST/AGST Act. It held that summary of show cause notic

Impugned GST Order Quashed for Lack of Proper Show Cause Notice, Violating Natural Justice Principles.
Case-Laws
GST
The HC quashed the impugned order for violating principles of natural justice by not providing proper show cause notice and opportunity of hearing u/ss 73 and 75(4) of CGST/AGST Act. It held that summary of show cause notice without mentioning reasons cannot initiate proceedings u/s 73. The attachment containing tax determination u/s 73(3) cannot substitute show cause not

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Opportunity for Defense Mandated Before Ex Parte Tax Liability Order Under GST Act.

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The HC held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to defend itself by filing objections and submitting documents before the assessing officer/competent authority, as the order imposing tax liability was passed

Opportunity for Defense Mandated Before Ex Parte Tax Liability Order Under GST Act.
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to defend itself by filing objections and submitting documents before the assessing officer/competent authority, as the order imposing tax liability was passed ex parte without proper service of show cause notice under GST Act. The principle of audi alteram partem mandates that no one should be condemned unheard, and procedural

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =