Author: admin_gst

Legal Challenge Succeeds: GST Section 130 Order Quashed Based on Precedent Interpreting Excess Stock Assessment Rules
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned orders dated 27.7.2022, 3.1.2023, and 27.11.2024 passed under Section 130 of the GST Act. The court relied on its prior precedent in Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar, which established that when excess stock is found, proceedings under Sections 73 and 74 of UPGST Act are applicable, and Section 130 proceedings c

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Punjab registers 25 pc growth in GST collections in May
GST
Dated:- 1-6-2025
PTI
Chandigarh, Jun 1 (PTI) Punjab registered a 25.31 per cent on-year growth in net goods and service tax (GST) collections in May to Rs 2,006.31 crore driven by strong tax administration and enhanced compliance.
Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema said Punjab's net GST revenue rose to Rs 2,006.31 crore in May, up from Rs 1,601.14 crore in May 2024, showing an increase of Rs 405.17 crore.
This marks the highest-ever GST collection for the month of May in Punjab's history, said Cheema in an official statement.
This year's performance clearly indicates a robust and accelerating growth trend in Punjab's fiscal health, he said and attributed the gro

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST collections above Rs 2 trillion for second straight month, at Rs 2.01 lakh cr in May
GST
Dated:- 1-6-2025
PTI
New Delhi, Jun 1 (PTI) Gross GST collections remained above the Rs 2 trillion mark for the second month in a row, rising 16.4 per cent in May to over Rs 2.01 lakh crore.
Goods and Services Tax (GST) collection had touched a record high of Rs 2.37 lakh crore in April. In May, 2024, the mop up was Rs 1,72,739 crore.
In May, 2025, gross revenues from domestic transactions rose 13.7 per cent to about Rs 1.50 lakh crore, while GST revenue from imports grew 25.2 per cent to Rs 51,266 crore. Total gross GST revenues stood at Rs 2,01,050 crore in May, 2025.
Gross Central GST revenues stood at Rs 35,434 crore, State GST

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

adhya Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan have shown median increases of 10 per cent.
“Hence, the average growth across the country does not appear to be uniformly reflected across states possibly due to sectoral or seasonal factors which require a deeper data based analysis,” Mani said.
Price Waterhouse & Co LLP Partner Pratik Jain said 16 per cent growth in GST collections in the month shows a renewed upward momentum after a few months of growth in the range of 11 to 12 per cent.
“If the growth continues in this range for the next couple of months, it might provide the cushion for the government to look at rate rationalization on which a lot of work has already been done,” Jain said.
EY India Tax Partner Saurabh Agarwal said lo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Gross GST collections rise 16.4 pc to over Rs 2.01 lakh cr in May
GST
Dated:- 1-6-2025
PTI
New Delhi, Jun 1 (PTI) Gross GST collections rose 16.4 per cent to over Rs 2.01 lakh crore in May, as per government data released on Sunday.
This comes after a record high Goods and Services Tax (GST) collection in April, when the revenues touched an all-time high of Rs 2.37 lakh crore.
In May, gross revenues from domestic transactions rose 13.7 per cent to about Rs 1.50 lakh crore, while GST revenue from imports grew 25.2 per cent to Rs 51,266 crore.
In May, the gross Central GST revenues stood at Rs 35,434 crore, State GST revenues at Rs 43,902 crore and Integrated GST at about Rs 1.09 lakh crore. Revenues from Cess was at Rs 12,8

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Contractual Services Qualify as Export, Affirming Independent Contractor Status and ITC Refund Eligibility Under IGST Act
Case-Laws
GST
HC analyzed the classification of services under IGST Act, determining the petitioner's activities do not constitute intermediary services. The court found the service provider operates as an independent contractor, rendering services on its own account, not as an agent. Based on contractual analysis and precedent, the court held the services qualify as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Genuine Medical Hardship Leads to GST Registration Restoration with Mandatory Compliance and Timely Return Submissions
Case-Laws
GST
HC allows restoration of GST registration after considering petitioner's genuine medical impediment for non-filing of returns. The court directs petitioner to file all pending returns, pay tax dues, interest, and belated filing fees within 4 weeks from registration restoration. The cancellation order is revoked subject to compliance with prescribed conditi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Conciliation Agreement Determines Limitation Period for Tax Refund Claims Under Section 54 of CGST Act
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that the conciliation agreement dated 09.10.2020 constitutes the relevant date for calculating limitation period under Section 54 of CGST Act. The settlement agreement, recognized under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, is equivalent to a civil court decree. Consequently, DMRC's refund applications filed on 17.01.2021 and 21.03.2021 were deemed timely. The court dir

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic Credit Ledger Interpreted as Unified Resource, Allowing Flexible Input Tax Credit Utilization Across Tax Compartments
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that the electronic credit ledger constitutes a unified resource with interconnected tax compartments (IGST, CGST, SGST). The court found that erroneously claiming Input Tax Credit under different heads does not automatically invalidate the claim. The impugned orders were set aside, directing the tax authority to reconsider the ITC claim

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Digital Invoice Number Oversight Nullifies Tax Assessment, Mandates Procedural Compliance and Fresh Evaluation Under GST Regulations
Case-Laws
GST
HC invalidated the assessment order due to absence of a Digital Invoice Number (DIN), following SC precedent in Pradeep Goyal v. Union of India. The court held that proceedings lacking a DIN are non-est and invalid, consistent with CBIC circular. The impugned order was set aside, granting the respondent liberty to conduct a fresh assessment w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Strikes Down Tax Assessment Order for Missing Crucial Document Identification Number, Allowing Procedural Correction
Case-Laws
GST
HC invalidated the GST assessment order in Form GST DRC-07 due to absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN), rendering the order non-est and invalid. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the court set aside the impugned order and granted liberty to the tax authority to recommence proceedings with proper DIN assignment after providing notice

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Refund Claim Wins: Interest Awarded with Precision, Accounting for Procedural Timelines and Partial Relief Calculation
Case-Laws
GST
HC ruled that the Petitioner is entitled to interest on refund claim, with nuanced calculations. Interest shall be payable from 7th/9th September, 2019 till 9th June, 2023 at varying rates (6% initially, then 9%), with a deduction of 74 days corresponding to Petitioner's response time to deficiency memo. The court balanced the procedural delays by both

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Demand Upheld: Procedural Gaps Noted, Petitioner Directed to Pursue Appellate Remedies Under Section 107 of CGST Act
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismisses petition challenging tax demand, finding procedural irregularities in the original order but declining to remand the matter. The court held that the Adjudicating Authority did not fully comply with previous judicial directions and natural justice principles. However, the petitioner is directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 o

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Fraudulent ITC Claim Rejected: Taxpayer Directed to Pursue Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 with Pre-Deposit Option
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging penalty for fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment under CGST Act, Section 122(1)(vii). The court held that writ jurisdiction should not be ordinarily exercised in cases involving ITC fraud, citing precedent. The petitioner was directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act and permitted t

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Taxpayer Wins Challenge Against Arbitrary Tax Demand Exceeding Original Show-Cause Notice Under Section 75(7)
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petition, finding a violation of Section 75(7) of GST Act. The tax authority issued a show-cause notice for Rs. 45,66,398 but subsequently raised a demand of Rs. 68,07,953, which exceeded the original notice amount. The court held that this contravened statutory provisions regarding tax determination. The petitioner's claim of being unaware of the no

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petitioner's Refund Claim Reinstated: Appellate Authority Ordered to Conduct Independent, Unbiased Review of Case Merits
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petitioner's appeal, finding the refund claim rejection erroneous. The Appellate Authority improperly dismissed the appeal based solely on administrative rank similarities between respondents. The court held that the 1st respondent, functioning as an Appellate Authority, should have independently reviewed the case merits without being infl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petitioner Wins Challenge Against GST Notices Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Natural Justice Principles
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petition, finding a violation of natural justice principles due to non-service of GST ASMT-10 and DRC-01 notices. Despite the petitioner's failure to contest the original proceedings, the court recognized bona fide reasons for non-participation. The ex-parte order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration, p

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Taxpayers Lose Challenge: Rule 36(4) Upheld, Restricting Input Tax Credit for Non-Compliant Invoice Uploads
Case-Laws
GST
HC upheld the validity of Rule 36(4) in CGST and TNGST Rules, which restricts Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment when suppliers fail to upload invoices under Section 37(1). The court determined that the rule was a temporary regulatory measure to protect government interests and taxpayers from potential recovery proceedings. The restrictions were deemed constitutionally

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Bail Granted: Fraudulent Tax Credit Case Highlights Personal Liberty and Presumption of Innocence
Case-Laws
GST
HC granted regular bail to petitioner accused of fraudulent Input Tax Credit involving fake invoices. After suffering 2 months and 6 days of custody, the court emphasized fundamental legal principles that bail is a general rule and detention an exception. Applying Article 21 constitutional protections and following precedential jurisprudence on right to speedy trial, the court

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Authority Ordered to Reconsider Order After Failing to Provide Proper Notice and Opportunity for Defense
Case-Laws
GST
HC found violation of natural justice principles in ex-parte tax liability order. The court held that the petitioner was not properly served with show cause notice and lacked opportunity to present defense. Applying precedent from similar cases, HC directed the impugned order be treated as a notice under Section 73 of GST Act, 2017, enabling the petitioner to submit

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Authority's Input Tax Credit Denial Upheld: Jurisdiction Confirmed, Procedural Challenges Rejected, Statutory Appeal Path Preserved
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging tax authority's order regarding input tax credit (ITC) denial. The court held that territorial jurisdiction exists where a fraction of cause of action arises within court's jurisdiction. The petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice from denial of witness cross-examination. The court

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Strikes Down Notice Procedure, Mandates Fair Hearing and Remands Case for Proper Adjudication Under Principles of Natural Justice
Case-Laws
GST
HC found the SCN uploaded in 'Additional Notices Tab' violated principles of natural justice, rendering the impugned order dated 5th August, 2024 invalid. The court remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority, granting the Petitioner time until 10th July 2025 to file a reply to the SCN. Upon reply submission, the Authority

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Taxpayer Wins: CGST Act Section 54(11) Mandates Refund Release Despite Department's Revenue Risk Concerns
Case-Laws
GST
HC ruled that under CGST Act Section 54(11), the Department cannot withhold a refund sanctioned by the Appellate Authority based solely on potential revenue risk or alleged fraud. Without a pending appeal or review challenging the Appellate Authority's order, the Department must release the refund with statutory interest. The petitioner is authorized to seek further le

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Registration Cancellation Overturned: Procedural Flaws Invalidate Retrospective Order, Ensuring Principles of Natural Justice
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the writ petition challenging retrospective GST registration cancellation. The court found a violation of natural justice principles due to absence of reasons in the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and lack of prior notice. The retrospective cancellation from 01 April 2022 was quashed, and the GST registration cancellation was modified to tak

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Legal Challenge Rejected: Taxpayer Must First Pursue Appellate Remedies Under CGST Act Section 107 Before Seeking Writ Relief
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the petition, holding that the Petitioner must first exhaust appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act before seeking writ jurisdiction. The Court declined to entertain the direct writ petition concerning alleged wrongful Input Tax Credit claims and overvaluation of goods for export incentives. The Petitioner was directed to file

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Credit Rectification Permitted for Genuine GST Invoicing Errors Under Section 16(4) Despite Statutory Time Limitations
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petition for rectification of GSTR-1 form for September 2020, permitting tax credit rectification beyond statutory time limits under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court recognized the petitioner's bonafide error in invoicing, referencing precedents from Wipro Limited and Railroad Logistics cases, which emphasized rectification of inadve

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =