The petitioners’ belated input tax credit denial u/s 16(4) of GST Acts overturned by High Court. Orders…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The petitioners' belated input tax credit denial u/s 16(4) of GST Acts overturned by High Court. Orders set aside, cases remitted to Assessing Officer for fresh decision as per Finance Act, 2024. If proposals in Finance Bill, 2024 are enacted, petitioners may benefit. Petitioners to deposit 25% disputed tax, excluding input tax credit denial, for orders on merits. Petition disposed off. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite the petitioner not challenging the allegedly erroneous orders. The Court clarified that a writ of prohibition is typically used to supervise and restrict courts or tribunals from acting beyond their jurisdiction. Reference was made to a Supreme Court case emphasizing the distinction between issuing writs of certiorari and prohibition to correct jurisdictional errors. While both writs can correct jurisdictional errors, certiorari corrects after a decision, and prohibition can prevent errors before a decision. In this case, as the appellate authority had already made a determination, issuing a writ of prohibition was deemed unnecessary. The Court found the petitioner's request to defer recovery without seeking adjudication of rights insufficient, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Liability to pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) for intra-state and interstate delivery of electrical…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Liability to pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) for intra-state and interstate delivery of electrical energy. The applicant questioned if they could claim CGST and SGST paid during the procurement of a solar power plant as input tax credit towards their GST liability. The ruling found that since the applicant invoiced only for the supply of electricity without including delivery charges, which are exempt from tax, they were not liable to pay GST on both intra-state and interstate deliveries. Additionally, as their output supplies were tax-exempt, they were not eligible to claim input tax credit on their inward supplies such as the solar power plant under relevant tax provisions. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Services provided to a government entity under Jal Jeevan Mission classified under SAC code 998399….

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Services provided to a government entity under Jal Jeevan Mission classified under SAC code 998399. Services to Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran for government functions are taxable at 18%. MJP's setup is lawful as a government-owned body. Exemption applies for services provided before 31-12-2021 under entry No. 3 of Notification No 12/2017. Services after 01-01-2022 not exempt as “Government Authority” omitted from the entry. AAR clarified the classification and tax treatment of the services. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The case involves the classification of supply of goods or services including Pani Puri, Masala Chat,…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The case involves the classification of supply of goods or services including Pani Puri, Masala Chat, Punjabi Lassi, Sev Puri, Samosa Chat, Vada Pav, Pav Bhaji without a brand name. It was determined that these items fall under the restaurant sales taxable at 5% GST rate. The service of serving cooked items across the counter is classified under HSN 996331. The applicable GST rate for restaurant services is 5% without input tax credit unless provided by specified establishments with a tariff above a certain threshold. If services are from specific premises, the rate is 18%. The ruling on HSN code and tax rate was inconclusive due to missing details. The decision was made by the Advance Ruling Authority. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Availability of input tax credit is restricted on inward supplies like spare purchases, repairs, and…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Availability of input tax credit is restricted on inward supplies like spare purchases, repairs, and refurbishment costs, except for old or used motor vehicles as per Notification 8/2018-Central Tax (Rate). The applicant, a registered taxpayer dealing in second-hand luxury cars, can claim input tax credit on expenses related to vehicle evaluation, refurbishment, and replacement of parts. The applicant can avail credit on direct and indirect expenses for the business, subject to conditions u/ss 16 to 21 of the CGST Act and rules 36 to 45 of CGST Rules. The ruling clarifies that there is no restriction on claiming input tax credit for expenses incurred in the second-hand luxury car business. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The ruling addressed the eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for cars used for demonstration purposes….

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The ruling addressed the eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for cars used for demonstration purposes. It was held that demo cars can be eligible for ITC if certain conditions are met, particularly if they are intended for further supply after the demo period. The use of cars for demos does not disqualify them from ITC if they are later used for making supplies. The applicant can claim ITC on demo cars if they are subsequently used for supply. However, this entitlement is subject to conditions, such as not claiming depreciation on the tax component of demo cars' cost and ensuring they are used for further supply. The ruling was made by the Advance Ruling Authority (AAR). – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Circular clarifies that insurance companies are not liable to pay GST on salvage/wreck value deducted…

Circulars – GST – States – Highlights – Circular clarifies that insurance companies are not liable to pay GST on salvage/wreck value deducted from claim settlement amount, as salvage remains property of insured. However, if claim settled without salvage deduction, salvage becomes property of insurer who must discharge GST on subsequent supply. For total loss cases where salvage deducted from claim amount as per policy terms, no GST payable by insurer on salvage value as ownership remains with insured. For claims settled at full insured value without salvage deduction, salvage ownership transfers to insurer necessitating GST payment on eventual sale. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Clarification provided on time of supply of services for spectrum usage and other similar services under…

Circulars – GST – States – Highlights – Clarification provided on time of supply of services for spectrum usage and other similar services under GST. For spectrum allocation, where telecom operator opts for deferred payment, it constitutes continuous supply of services as defined u/s 2(33) of WBGST Act. Time of supply governed by section 13(3) of WBGST Act, being earlier of payment date or 60 days from document issue date. Frequency Assignment Letter not considered invoice for 60-day period calculation. Invoice required on or before due date per section 31(5)(a). For upfront payment, GST payable when payment made or due, whichever earlier. For deferred instalments, GST payable as instalments due or paid, whichever earlier. Similar treatment for other natural resource allocations constituting continuous supply. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Violation of principles of natural justice challenged through ex-parte demand order and show cause…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Violation of principles of natural justice challenged through ex-parte demand order and show cause notice (SCN). Impugned SCN provided less time than stipulated u/s 73(2) of UP GST Act for submitting reply, citing mismatch in GSTR filed. Court held that adjournment application would have been entertained if petitioner had given written reply to SCN and then sought adjournment. Neither application dated 23.1.2024 nor 15.4.2024 received by respondents. Court opined law relied upon by petitioner's counsel from M/s Mohan Agencies case inapplicable. Petition dismissed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different officer from investigating officer….

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Jurisdiction challenge to assessment orders passed by different officer from investigating officer. Petitioner negligent in non-participation in proceedings emanating from notices. Opportunity given subject to 10% disputed tax deposit within 8 weeks. Impugned quashed orders treated as addendum to notices. Petitioner to file separate replies within 12 weeks. Final orders on merits to be passed within 2 months thereafter. Petition disposed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Grant of regular bail in case involving sale/purchase of fake GST entities, issuance of fake firms and…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Grant of regular bail in case involving sale/purchase of fake GST entities, issuance of fake firms and fraudulent beneficiaries of fake GST ITC. Considering attending circumstances, materials on record, law laid down in Ratnambar Kaushik and Satendra Kumar Antil cases, maximum punishment of up to 5 years, petitioner's custody for over 4 months, offence based on documentary evidence, investigation concluded, final P.R. submitted, HC persuaded to release petitioner on bail on stringent terms and conditions. Petitioner directed to be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with two local solvent sureties each of like amount to satisfaction of court in seisin over matter and subject to fulfilment of conditions imposed. Bail application allowed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The High Court disposed off the petition, awaiting the final decision of the Supreme Court in UDAIPUR…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court disposed off the petition, awaiting the final decision of the Supreme Court in UDAIPUR CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. regarding the levy of GST on mining activities under the reverse charge mechanism. The recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned orders shall be kept in abeyance pending disposal of the appeal by the Supreme Court. The petitioner is given liberty to file a statutory appeal without pre-deposit, in view of the Supreme Court's decision. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Writ petition challenging adjudication order u/s 73(9) of West Bengal GST/CGST Act, 2017, dismissed….

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Writ petition challenging adjudication order u/s 73(9) of West Bengal GST/CGST Act, 2017, dismissed. Proper officer failed to call for records before passing order, violating natural justice principles. Statutory pre-deposit required for appeal not made. Petitioner permitted to approach Appellate Authority after making statutory pre-deposit. Writ petition disposed of. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petition challenging assessment order and consequential bank attachment was allowed. Impugned order…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Petition challenging assessment order and consequential bank attachment was allowed. Impugned order imposing tax liability on allegation of sale suppression based on purchase-outward supply value difference was set aside. Petitioner claimed unawareness of proceedings due to non-receipt of show cause notice. Considering petitioner's assertion and nature of confirmed tax proposal, reconsideration warranted by remitting 5% of disputed tax demand within two weeks and submitting reply to show cause notice within said period. Petition disposed of. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Hostel accommodation services provided for 10 months’ duration are exempt under Serial Number 12 of…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Hostel accommodation services provided for 10 months' duration are exempt under Serial Number 12 of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as per the Madras High Court ruling in Thai Mookambikaa Ladies Hostel case. However, such services for 1-2 months to new students during vacation are not exempt under Serial Number 3. For old students extending stay by 1-2 months after 10 months' residence, the extension is considered long-term tenure, eligible for exemption under Serial Number 3. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Demand on account of alleged delay in availing Input Tax Credit purportedly Rs. 23,35,892/- out of Rs….

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Demand on account of alleged delay in availing Input Tax Credit purportedly Rs. 23,35,892/- out of Rs. 57,12,114/-. Impugned order set aside to that extent, case remitted to consider proposals in GST Council's 53rd Meeting and Finance (No.2) Bill, 2024 (Bill No.55 of 2024) Clause 114 & 146. For balance amount Rs. 33,76,222/-, petitioner given liberty to file statutory appeal within 30 days. Petition disposed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petitioners did not make required pre-deposit for maintaining appeal – appeal initially filed belatedly,…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Petitioners did not make required pre-deposit for maintaining appeal – appeal initially filed belatedly, defective and rejected without merits – subsequent appeal filed with pre-deposit also belated – no lack of bona fide – petitioners already paid over 11% of disputed tax, more than required for appeal – matter remanded to appellate authority for decision on merits as substantial compliance with pre-deposit. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) on…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) on export of goods u/s 16(3) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner furnished Bank Realization Certificates (BRCs) evidencing realization of sale proceeds, and the application for refund could not be rejected solely on the ground of non-production of BRCs within nine months. Regarding furnishing bank statements and ledger accounts of suppliers, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh whether the petitioner made payment to suppliers for inward supplies against which refund of accumulated ITC is claimed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petitioner failed to substantiate Input Tax Credit claim due to lack of supplier certificates….

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Petitioner failed to substantiate Input Tax Credit claim due to lack of supplier certificates. Discrepancy noted between Input Tax Credit availed in GSTR 3B and auto-populated in GSTR 2A. Electronic Credit Ledger balance after adjustment indicates inadequate explanation. Petitioner's credit tax position appears incorrect, unable to avail claimed IGST amount under CGST and SGST credit. Court grants temporary relief, staying recovery proceedings for three months, allowing petitioner to file revision petition u/s 161 within 30 days. Petition disposed. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Penalties, late fees, penal interest, and fines levied by RBI for contravention or violation of laws are…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Penalties, late fees, penal interest, and fines levied by RBI for contravention or violation of laws are for maintaining discipline and deterrence, not consideration for services, hence not taxable under GST as per circular. Penalties for non-performance or underperformance by vendors as per contract with RBI are liquidated damages to compensate for loss, not consideration for services, hence not taxable under GST as per circular. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Applicant, a government company established by Central and State governments with 50% equity…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Applicant, a government company established by Central and State governments with 50% equity participation each, sought advance ruling on eligibility for exemption under Sr. No. 41 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) for leasing services provided. The Authority ruled that since the Central/State government has 20% or more ownership in the applicant entity, it is ineligible for the exemption. Hence, 18% GST is applicable on the leasing services provided. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rectification application dismissed as error not apparent on record. Excess GST collected from customers…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – Rectification application dismissed as error not apparent on record. Excess GST collected from customers to be refunded to them before claiming refund from tax authorities to avoid unjust enrichment. Classifying “other charges” as consideration for construction services under HSN Code 9954 or separate services under respective heads not a rectifiable mistake. AAR ruling upheld in interest of equity and uniformity among flat buyers, irrespective of projects or timelines. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The works rendered by the applicant involving application of polymer protective coating for bridges, as…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The works rendered by the applicant involving application of polymer protective coating for bridges, as part of construction or routine maintenance/renovation, falls under the definition of “works contract” u/s 2(119) of the CGST Act, 2017, and will be treated as supply of service under Service Code 995473. The composite supply of such works contract for construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of a bridge for road transportation for use by the general public is taxable at 12% under Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended. The status or category of the recipient is immaterial for determining the tax rate. The applicable tax rate may vary based on the time of supply, being 18% (9% CGST and 9% SGST) from 01.07.2017 to 21.08.2017, 12% (6% CGST and 6% SGST) from 22.08.2017 to 17.07.2022, and 18% (9% CGST and 9% SGST) from 18.07.2022 onwards. The eligibility for exemption under Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) is deemed irrelevant based on the ruling. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The petitioner filed a refund application within the two-year limitation period for the year 2017-2018…

Case-Laws – GST – Highlights – The petitioner filed a refund application within the two-year limitation period for the year 2017-2018 on 17.09.2018, and subsequently filed a fresh refund application on 2.01.2020 after receiving a deficiency memo. The High Court held that the original refund application filed on 17.09.2018 would be considered a proper refund application within the limitation period, and the fresh refund application filed pursuant to the deficiency memo would be considered a continuation of the first refund application. The impugned order dated 20.02.2020 rejecting the refund application on the ground of limitation was quashed and set aside, and the refund application filed on 17.09.2018 was restored for consideration on merits by the proper officer in accordance with the law. – TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts Tax Management India – taxmanagementindia – taxmanagement – taxmanagementindia.com – TMI – TaxTMI – TMITax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =