IGST Refund Denied Due to Concealment and GST Registration Cancellation Since 2018, Petition Dismissed with Costs

IGST Refund Denied Due to Concealment and GST Registration Cancellation Since 2018, Petition Dismissed with CostsCase-LawsGSTThe HC dismissed the petition seeking IGST refund with interest due to concealment of material facts by the petitioner, who failed

IGST Refund Denied Due to Concealment and GST Registration Cancellation Since 2018, Petition Dismissed with Costs
Case-Laws
GST
The HC dismissed the petition seeking IGST refund with interest due to concealment of material facts by the petitioner, who failed to attend the personal hearing and did not satisfactorily address queries regarding the cancellation of its GST registration since 2018. The court held that no refund can be granted without restoration of the petitioner's GST regist

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax and penalty demand beyond statutory period under Section 129 of Odisha GST Act quashed for late notice issuance

Tax and penalty demand beyond statutory period under Section 129 of Odisha GST Act quashed for late notice issuanceCase-LawsGSTThe HC held that the impugned demand for tax and penalty issued on 11th September, 2024, was beyond the statutory period prescri

Tax and penalty demand beyond statutory period under Section 129 of Odisha GST Act quashed for late notice issuance
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that the impugned demand for tax and penalty issued on 11th September, 2024, was beyond the statutory period prescribed under Section 129 of the Odisha GST Act, 2017, as the notice was dated 31st August, 2024. Consequently, the demand was invalid due to non-compliance with the prescribed timeline for issuance following vehicle detention. The court

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Taxpayers Moved to Large Taxpayer Unit for GST and Coal Cess Compliance from June 1, 2025

Taxpayers Moved to Large Taxpayer Unit for GST and Coal Cess Compliance from June 1, 2025CircularsGST – StatesCertain taxpayers registered under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, have been transferred from various local charges to the Larg

Taxpayers Moved to Large Taxpayer Unit for GST and Coal Cess Compliance from June 1, 2025
Circulars
GST – States
Certain taxpayers registered under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, have been transferred from various local charges to the Large Taxpayer Unit to enhance revenue administration. This jurisdictional change includes compliance responsibilities related to the Cess on coal under the West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973, and the West Bengal Rural Employment an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Authority Deselects Eight Registered Persons from Audit Under Section 65 of West Bengal GST Act 2017

Tax Authority Deselects Eight Registered Persons from Audit Under Section 65 of West Bengal GST Act 2017CircularsGST – StatesThe tax authority deselected eight registered persons from audit under section 65 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017,

Tax Authority Deselects Eight Registered Persons from Audit Under Section 65 of West Bengal GST Act 2017
Circulars
GST – States
The tax authority deselected eight registered persons from audit under section 65 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, for the periods between April 1, 2021, and March 31, 2023. The deselection was based on reasons including cancellation of registration ab initio and referral to the National Company Law Tribunal. This decision applies immediately an

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Net FDI has fallen steeply, domestic investors gripped by 'fear': Congress slams govt

Net FDI has fallen steeply, domestic investors gripped by ‘fear’: Congress slams govtGSTDated:- 28-7-2025PTINew Delhi, Jul 28 (PTI) The Congress on Monday claimed that the net foreign direct investment has fallen steeply while domestic investors are gripp

Net FDI has fallen steeply, domestic investors gripped by 'fear': Congress slams govt
GST
Dated:- 28-7-2025
PTI
New Delhi, Jul 28 (PTI) The Congress on Monday claimed that the net foreign direct investment has fallen steeply while domestic investors are gripped by “fear and uncertainty”, as it asked the government to support incomes, end its “crony capitalist and tax terrorism” policies, fix the GST, and protect Indian industries from Chinese dumping.
The opposition party's assertion came after Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman's reported remarks that India’s private sector investment has not kept pace with the growing public expenditure.
In a post on X, Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh sai

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

h awaits fundamental reform, Ramesh argued.
Finally, the “dumping” of cheap imports from China which is taking place despite the loss of Indian territory in Ladakh has also led to the closure of domestic manufacturing units, foreclosing the possibility of new investments, he said.
“Acknowledgment is the first step. Now comes the hard part the government needs to take action to support incomes, put an end to its crony capitalist and tax terrorism policies, fix the GST, and protect our industries from Chinese dumping,” Ramesh said.
The Congress has been attacking the government over its handling of the economy, claiming the issues of rising prices, decreasing private investment and stagnating wages were hitting the common people hard. P

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Adjudicating and appellate orders set aside for violating natural justice under GST Act and EPCG Scheme, case remanded for fresh decision

Adjudicating and appellate orders set aside for violating natural justice under GST Act and EPCG Scheme, case remanded for fresh decisionCase-LawsGSTThe HC set aside both the adjudicating authority’s order dated 27.07.2023 and the appellate authority’s or

Adjudicating and appellate orders set aside for violating natural justice under GST Act and EPCG Scheme, case remanded for fresh decision
Case-Laws
GST
The HC set aside both the adjudicating authority's order dated 27.07.2023 and the appellate authority's order dated 21.05.2024, finding a violation of natural justice due to failure to consider the petitioner's reply and supporting circulars. The adjudicating authority did not provide reasoned or speaking orders, neglecting to analyze th

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Recovery of CGST before appeal period expiry was wrongful; refund with interest ordered under relevant statute

Recovery of CGST before appeal period expiry was wrongful; refund with interest ordered under relevant statuteCase-LawsGSTThe HC held that the recovery of CGST from the petitioners’ account prior to the expiration of the appeal filing period was erroneous

Recovery of CGST before appeal period expiry was wrongful; refund with interest ordered under relevant statute
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that the recovery of CGST from the petitioners' account prior to the expiration of the appeal filing period was erroneous. The Assistant Commissioner acknowledged the recovery was made by mistake. Consequently, the respondent is directed to rectify the error by refunding or reversing the erroneously recovered amount to the petitioners' account, along w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Denial of Input Tax Credit on Motor Vehicle Expenses Upheld Under Sections 16(1), 16(2), and 17(5) of CGST Act

Denial of Input Tax Credit on Motor Vehicle Expenses Upheld Under Sections 16(1), 16(2), and 17(5) of CGST ActCase-LawsGSTThe HC upheld the denial of input tax credit (ITC) claimed on invoices related to motor vehicle purchase, repair, and maintenance, fi

Denial of Input Tax Credit on Motor Vehicle Expenses Upheld Under Sections 16(1), 16(2), and 17(5) of CGST Act
Case-Laws
GST
The HC upheld the denial of input tax credit (ITC) claimed on invoices related to motor vehicle purchase, repair, and maintenance, finding violations of Sections 16(1), 16(2), and 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, and Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017. The petitioner failed to demonstrate payment to sundry creditors within the mandatory 180-day period as required under

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic Credit Ledger Payment Discharges GST Liability; Sec. 74 Not Applicable Without Wilful Misstatement or Suppression

Electronic Credit Ledger Payment Discharges GST Liability; Sec. 74 Not Applicable Without Wilful Misstatement or SuppressionCase-LawsGSTThe HC held that since the entire tax liability was discharged through the electronic credit ledger before any intimati

Electronic Credit Ledger Payment Discharges GST Liability; Sec. 74 Not Applicable Without Wilful Misstatement or Suppression
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that since the entire tax liability was discharged through the electronic credit ledger before any intimation or show-cause notice, and there was no wilful mis-statement or suppression by the petitioner, the provisions of Sec. 74 of the GST Act are inapplicable. The petitioner's failure to offset the tax liability from the credit ledger w

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Order under Sec. 129(3) GST quashed for violating natural justice by denying proper hearing opportunity

Order under Sec. 129(3) GST quashed for violating natural justice by denying proper hearing opportunityCase-LawsGSTThe HC quashed and set aside the impugned order of tax and penalty levy under Sec. 129(3) of the GST Act due to a flagrant violation of prin

Order under Sec. 129(3) GST quashed for violating natural justice by denying proper hearing opportunity
Case-Laws
GST
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order of tax and penalty levy under Sec. 129(3) of the GST Act due to a flagrant violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent authorities passed the order on the same day as the interception of goods without granting the petitioner adequate opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice, despite the statutory seven

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Ex-Parte Assessment Order Quashed for Violating Natural Justice Under Section 75(4) of BGST Act 2017

Ex-Parte Assessment Order Quashed for Violating Natural Justice Under Section 75(4) of BGST Act 2017Case-LawsGSTThe HC held that the impugned ex-parte assessment order and subsequent demand under Form DRC 07 were invalid due to violation of natural justic

Ex-Parte Assessment Order Quashed for Violating Natural Justice Under Section 75(4) of BGST Act 2017
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that the impugned ex-parte assessment order and subsequent demand under Form DRC 07 were invalid due to violation of natural justice principles, specifically non-service of proper notices and failure to grant an opportunity of hearing as mandated by Section 75(4) of the BGST Act, 2017. The Court clarified that uploading notices under incorrect headings did not s

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Software developer booked for GST evasion, house raided in Nashik

Software developer booked for GST evasion, house raided in NashikGSTDated:- 27-7-2025PTINashik, Jul 27 (PTI) The Goods and Services Tax (GST) department conducted a raid at the house of a software developer accused of tax evasion and creating fake invoice

Software developer booked for GST evasion, house raided in Nashik
GST
Dated:- 27-7-2025
PTI
Nashik, Jul 27 (PTI) The Goods and Services Tax (GST) department conducted a raid at the house of a software developer accused of tax evasion and creating fake invoices in Maharashtra's Nashik, an official said on Sunday.
A team from the Pune Goods & Services Tax (GST) intelligence department raided the house of Shrikant Prasad Parhe in the Nashik Road area on Saturday, the official said.
A

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Authority Extends GST Audit Completion Period for 2021-2022 Audits Under Relevant State GST Act

Tax Authority Extends GST Audit Completion Period for 2021-2022 Audits Under Relevant State GST ActCircularsGST – StatesThe tax authority extended the audit completion period under the relevant state GST Act for audits commencing between April 1, 2021, an

Tax Authority Extends GST Audit Completion Period for 2021-2022 Audits Under Relevant State GST Act
Circulars
GST – States
The tax authority extended the audit completion period under the relevant state GST Act for audits commencing between April 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, due to delays caused by requests from audited parties for additional time to produce accounting records. The original three-month completion requirement from the audit start date was deemed insufficient. The extensi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Penalty under Section 129(3) GST Act quashed due to technical glitch, no intent to evade tax found

Penalty under Section 129(3) GST Act quashed due to technical glitch, no intent to evade tax foundCase-LawsGSTThe HC set aside the penalty imposed under section 129(3) of the GST Act for non-filing of Part-B of the e-way bill, finding no intent to evade t

Penalty under Section 129(3) GST Act quashed due to technical glitch, no intent to evade tax found
Case-Laws
GST
The HC set aside the penalty imposed under section 129(3) of the GST Act for non-filing of Part-B of the e-way bill, finding no intent to evade tax. The petitioner demonstrated that the omission was due to a technical glitch, a fact undisputed in the record. The Court relied on precedents affirming that mere non-filing of the e-way bill does not attract penalty absent a tax e

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

PVC Raincoats Classified Under HSN 3926 as Plastic Articles, Attracting 18% GST Under Schedule III Entry 111

PVC Raincoats Classified Under HSN 3926 as Plastic Articles, Attracting 18% GST Under Schedule III Entry 111Case-LawsGSTThe AAAR held that PVC raincoats are correctly classified under HSN Code 3926 as plastic articles, not under HSN Code 6201 for textile

PVC Raincoats Classified Under HSN 3926 as Plastic Articles, Attracting 18% GST Under Schedule III Entry 111
Case-Laws
GST
The AAAR held that PVC raincoats are correctly classified under HSN Code 3926 as plastic articles, not under HSN Code 6201 for textile apparel, since PVC is a synthetic polymer and not a woven textile. The mutually exclusive nature of Chapters 39 and 62 precludes classification of PVC raincoats as textile garments. Consequently, the GST rate applicable to PVC rainco

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HC refuses extraordinary relief in ITC blocking under Rule 86A, emphasizing factual inquiry and evidence-based decisions

HC refuses extraordinary relief in ITC blocking under Rule 86A, emphasizing factual inquiry and evidence-based decisionsCase-LawsGSTThe HC declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 in a petition challenging the blocking of

HC refuses extraordinary relief in ITC blocking under Rule 86A, emphasizing factual inquiry and evidence-based decisions
Case-Laws
GST
The HC declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 in a petition challenging the blocking of input tax credit under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017, relating to alleged non-existent suppliers. The Court emphasized that Rule 36 requires documentary evidence for claiming input tax credit, and fact-finding on the genuineness

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Ex-Parte Order Set Aside for Violating Rule 142 CGST Rules, Ensuring Fair Hearing Under Section 73 CGST Act

Ex-Parte Order Set Aside for Violating Rule 142 CGST Rules, Ensuring Fair Hearing Under Section 73 CGST ActCase-LawsGSTThe HC set aside the impugned ex-parte order due to non-compliance with Rule 142 of the CGST Rules, 2017, and violation of natural justi

Ex-Parte Order Set Aside for Violating Rule 142 CGST Rules, Ensuring Fair Hearing Under Section 73 CGST Act
Case-Laws
GST
The HC set aside the impugned ex-parte order due to non-compliance with Rule 142 of the CGST Rules, 2017, and violation of natural justice principles. Although electronic service of notice under the GST regime is generally upheld, the Court found the procedural irregularity and lack of a reasonable opportunity to be heard prejudicial in the present case. Considering

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Section 93 CGST Act: Recovery Proceedings Against Deceased's Property Set Aside, Legal Representatives Allowed to Proceed

Section 93 CGST Act: Recovery Proceedings Against Deceased’s Property Set Aside, Legal Representatives Allowed to ProceedCase-LawsGSTThe HC set aside the impugned order dated 22 December 2023 concerning recovery proceedings against the immovable propertie

Section 93 CGST Act: Recovery Proceedings Against Deceased's Property Set Aside, Legal Representatives Allowed to Proceed
Case-Laws
GST
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 22 December 2023 concerning recovery proceedings against the immovable properties of the petitioner's deceased wife under Section 93 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court granted liberty to proceed against the legal representatives of the deceased in accordance with the law. Consequently, the Form GST DRC-16 order da

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Writ Petition on Alleged Rs. 63.83 Crore ITC Fraud Dismissed; Appeal Allowed Under Section 107 CGST Act

Writ Petition on Alleged Rs. 63.83 Crore ITC Fraud Dismissed; Appeal Allowed Under Section 107 CGST ActCase-LawsGSTThe HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction in a case involving allegations of fraudulent availment of ITC amounting to approximately Rs.

Writ Petition on Alleged Rs. 63.83 Crore ITC Fraud Dismissed; Appeal Allowed Under Section 107 CGST Act
Case-Laws
GST
The HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction in a case involving allegations of fraudulent availment of ITC amounting to approximately Rs. 63.83 crores by 23 fake firms. Citing precedent, the Court held that writ petitions challenging such allegations are ordinarily not maintainable due to the significant impact on the GST regime and the exchequer. Although the petition

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Retrospective Extension Allows Rectification of Orders on Wrongful Input Tax Credit Claims Under CGST Section 16(4)

Retrospective Extension Allows Rectification of Orders on Wrongful Input Tax Credit Claims Under CGST Section 16(4)Case-LawsGSTThe HC held that the retrospective extension of the time limit to avail input tax credit under sub-section (4) of Section 16 of

Retrospective Extension Allows Rectification of Orders on Wrongful Input Tax Credit Claims Under CGST Section 16(4)
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that the retrospective extension of the time limit to avail input tax credit under sub-section (4) of Section 16 of the CGST Act, as per the Ministry of Finance circular dated 15-10-2024, permits taxpayers to seek rectification of orders passed under Sections 73, 74, 107, or 108 of the CGST Act regarding wrongful input tax credit claims. Pursuant

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

HC upholds Sections 69 and 132 of CGST Act on arrest and punishment powers under Article 246A

HC upholds Sections 69 and 132 of CGST Act on arrest and punishment powers under Article 246ACase-LawsGSTThe HC dismissed the challenge to the vires of Sections 69 and 132 of the CGST Act, 2017, which confer power to arrest and prescribe punishment, holdi

HC upholds Sections 69 and 132 of CGST Act on arrest and punishment powers under Article 246A
Case-Laws
GST
The HC dismissed the challenge to the vires of Sections 69 and 132 of the CGST Act, 2017, which confer power to arrest and prescribe punishment, holding that the contention lacked merit in light of the recent Supreme Court decision in Radhika Agarwal v. Union of India. The SC upheld the constitutional validity of these provisions, affirming that Article 246A grants Parliament excl

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Retiring Partner Remains Liable Under Section 90 CGST Act Without Timely Retirement Notice

Retiring Partner Remains Liable Under Section 90 CGST Act Without Timely Retirement NoticeCase-LawsGSTThe HC dismissed the writ petition seeking to set aside the summoning order and restrain respondents from attaching the petitioner’s property. The Court

Retiring Partner Remains Liable Under Section 90 CGST Act Without Timely Retirement Notice
Case-Laws
GST
The HC dismissed the writ petition seeking to set aside the summoning order and restrain respondents from attaching the petitioner's property. The Court held that a retiring partner's liability under the CGST Act continues until a written intimation of retirement is duly served on the Commissioner within one month of retirement. The petitioner failed to provide timely notice of retir

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Separate SCNs under Sections 73 and 74 valid; petitioner must use appeal, not writ, for GST demands

Separate SCNs under Sections 73 and 74 valid; petitioner must use appeal, not writ, for GST demandsCase-LawsGSTThe HC held that issuance of separate SCNs under Sections 73 and 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act for the same period is valid, as Section 73 pertains t

Separate SCNs under Sections 73 and 74 valid; petitioner must use appeal, not writ, for GST demands
Case-Laws
GST
The HC held that issuance of separate SCNs under Sections 73 and 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act for the same period is valid, as Section 73 pertains to tax short paid without fraud, while Section 74 addresses fraud or wilful suppression. The petitioner's challenge to the SCN's vagueness was rejected, noting adequate particulars were provided per statutory requirements and the peti

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Stay on GST recovery upheld under Section 112(9) after petitioner meets pre-deposit conditions in tax dispute

Stay on GST recovery upheld under Section 112(9) after petitioner meets pre-deposit conditions in tax disputeCase-LawsGSTThe HC disposed of the writ petition concerning the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal and the petitioner’s request for a stay on re

Stay on GST recovery upheld under Section 112(9) after petitioner meets pre-deposit conditions in tax dispute
Case-Laws
GST
The HC disposed of the writ petition concerning the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal and the petitioner's request for a stay on recovery proceedings pending appeal. The petitioner had already deposited 10% of the tax demand and agreed to deposit an additional 10% of the remaining amount. In light of the Government of India's circular and the petitioner's undert

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Writ Petition Allowed Against Duplicate Assessment Order Under DRC 01; Earlier Assessment Prevents Repetition

Writ Petition Allowed Against Duplicate Assessment Order Under DRC 01; Earlier Assessment Prevents RepetitionCase-LawsGSTThe HC allowed the writ petition challenging the impugned assessment order issued following notice in DRC 01, noting that the petition

Writ Petition Allowed Against Duplicate Assessment Order Under DRC 01; Earlier Assessment Prevents Repetition
Case-Laws
GST
The HC allowed the writ petition challenging the impugned assessment order issued following notice in DRC 01, noting that the petitioner had already undergone an assessment for the same period by the State Tax Officer. The court held that the statutory scheme precludes duplication of assessment proceedings for the identical period. Consequently, the impugned order

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =