Author: admin_gst

Legal Challenge Succeeds: Rectification Order Overturned Due to Procedural Violations and Lack of Reasoned Decision
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petition challenging a rectification order, finding procedural violations of natural justice. The court held that when a rectification application is rejected, the authority must provide reasoned order and opportunity of hearing to the applicant. The impugned order dated 28.03.2025 was set aside, directing the respondent to reconsider the rectification application afresh, provide notice to the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with legal principles, particularly Section 161's third proviso mandating hearing when an order adversely affects an assessee.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Procedural Defects Invalidate GST Notice: Mere Portal Upload Insufficient, Natural Justice Principles Demand Actual Receipt of Communication
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the petition, setting aside the impugned order dated 29.04.2024 due to procedural impropriety. The court found that mere uploading of notice on the GST portal without ensuring actual receipt constitutes a violation of natural justice principles. The first respondent failed to diligently explore alternative notice service modes under Section 169 of GST Act, rendering the original order invalid. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, providing the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the show cause notice through proper communication channels.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Frozen Meat Supplies Taxed: GST Applies When Packaging Rules Unmet, Labeling Declaration Missing
Case-Laws
GST
The AAR ruled on GST applicability for frozen meat product supplies. Hotels qualify as industrial consumers under Rule 2(bb) of Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011. However, supplies were not exempted from GST due to absence of 'Not for Retail Sale' declaration on packages. Inter-branch transfers and distributor sales require GST charging since mandatory packaging requirements were not met. The ruling mandates GST application when specific labeling conditions are not fulfilled, emphasizing strict compliance with packaging regulations for potential tax exemption.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Applies to RWA Corpus Funds: Maintenance Collections Taxable with Input Credit and Exemption Limits
Case-Laws
GST
AAR ruled that corpus/sinking fund collection by a Resident Welfare Association constitutes a taxable supply under GST. The key findings are: (1) amounts collected from members for maintenance and building work are considered advance payments towards future services, (2) such collections are subject to CGST and SGST, (3) input tax credit can be utilized with restrictions under Rule 42, and (4) monthly subscriptions under Rs. 7,500 per member remain GST-exempt. The housing society must register under GST if turnover exceeds 20 Lakhs and comply with applicable tax regulations when collecting funds for maintenance and capital improvements.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Rule 96(10) Deletion Invalidates Subsequent Proceedings, Halting Administrative Actions Without Saving Clause
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules, being unconditionally omitted without a saving clause, rendered any subsequent proceedings under that rule invalid. The court applied principles from Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd, determining that when a rule is deleted without preserving pending proceedings, all actions must cease. Consequently, the HC allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order issued by the respondent, which was passed after the rule's omission, thereby preventing further action under the deleted provision.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Supplier's Tax Registration Validity Upheld, ITC Claim Requires Comprehensive Evidence Review Under GST Provisions
Case-Laws
GST
HC finds that lower authorities failed to adequately examine critical evidence regarding input tax credit (ITC) claim. Despite supplier's subsequent registration cancellation, registration was valid during relevant period. Authorities did not conclusively determine supplier's tax compliance or verify actual goods movement. The court set aside both original and appellate orders, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for comprehensive re-examination of documentary evidence and substantive compliance with GST Act provisions, thereby allowing petitioner an opportunity to substantiate ITC claim through proper procedural review.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Contractor Fails to Recover Dues as Evidence Gaps Prevent Claim Validation Under Project Completion Requirements
Case-Laws
GST
HC denied petitioner's claim for outstanding dues due to lack of documentary evidence demonstrating work completion. The court found no substantive proof of project finalization or quantification of claimed amounts. Given disputed factual questions and absence of a completion certificate, the court declined to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without granting the requested relief.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Notification Misinterpretation: GST Paragraph 3(iv) Limited to Pre-GST Contracts, Reimbursement Rights Affirmed for Post-July 2017 Contracts
Case-Laws
GST
HC determined that the respondent authority misconstrued the GST notification's applicability. The court held that paragraph 3(iv) of the notification applies exclusively to pre-GST contracts and cannot be used to deny reimbursement for contracts executed after July 1, 2017, which are governed by paragraph 4. The HC directed the public works department secretary to revisit the petitioner's claim regarding GST payment against gross bills from July 1, 2017 to March 31, 2019, in accordance with GST law, effectively remanding the matter for reconsideration and potential reimbursement.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Credit Appeal: Petitioner Must Submit DRC-03A Form to Validate Deposit and Enable Appellate Challenge
Case-Laws
GST
HC ruled on pre-deposit requirements for tax credit appeal. The petitioner was directed to submit Form DRC-03A to the Adjudicating Authority, demonstrating prior tax credit deposit. The authority must issue confirmation within one month, which can then be used as pre-deposit evidence for filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) challenging the original order. The court effectively provided a procedural mechanism for the petitioner to validate and utilize existing tax credit deposits in the appellate process. Petition was disposed of with specific procedural instructions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Credit Challenge Dismissed: Procedural Defects Noted, Appeal Path Open Under Section 107 with Mandatory Pre-Deposit
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging tax credit assessment, finding no violation of natural justice. The court noted petitioners failed to substantively contest the main issue of goods supply and input tax credit. While rejecting procedural challenges regarding relied upon documents (RUDs), the HC granted liberty to file an appeal under Section 107 of CGST Act by 15th July, 2025, with mandatory pre-deposit, ensuring merits-based appellate review. The decision emphasizes procedural compliance and substantive argumentation in tax dispute resolution.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Goods Transportation Case Reveals Critical Procedural Flaws in Vehicle Detention and Documentation Enforcement
Case-Laws
GST
HC adjudicated a GST goods transportation dispute involving vehicle detention and documentation irregularities. The court critically examined the procedural compliance of tax authorities in issuing Form GST MOV-1 and Form MOV-2. Key legal contentions centered on improper invocation of Sections 129 and 130 of the GST Act, particularly regarding goods not being in transit when documentation was issued. The court found significant procedural irregularities in the authorities' approach to goods confiscation and documentation. Consequently, the HC issued a notice returnable on 7th May, 2025, indicating potential procedural challenges to the tax authorities' actions and signaling a potential review of the detention and documentation process.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Uploading Show Cause Notice Exclusively on GST Portal Deemed Insufficient, Requiring Comprehensive Communication Channels Under Section 169
Case-Laws
GST
HC held that uploading show cause notice solely on GST Portal without alternative communication modes constitutes procedural deficiency. While portal notification is valid service, repeated notices without exploring additional communication channels under Section 169 of GST Act renders service ineffective. The ex parte order lacks substantive compliance, potentially triggering unnecessary litigation. The court set aside the impugned order, emphasizing that administrative authorities must diligently ensure comprehensive notice transmission, preferably through registered post, to uphold principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Return Rectification Denied: Petitioner Ordered to Deposit Additional 5% Tax and File Appeal Within 30 Days
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST return rectification, finding insufficient documentary evidence to substantiate the petitioner's claim of inadvertent double entries. The court held that the tax liability comparison statement was inadequate to prove the alleged errors. While dismissing the petition, the HC granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within 30 days, subject to depositing an additional 5% of disputed tax, bringing the total statutory deposit to 15%. The Appellate Authority is directed to hear and decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Writ Petition Succeeds: Export Unit Wins IGST Refund Challenge Due to Procedural Violations in Revenue Department's Demand
Case-Laws
GST
HC allowed the writ petition, quashing the order dated 10.07.2024 concerning IGST refund for an Export Oriented Unit. The court found procedural irregularities in the revenue department's demand, specifically the failure to issue a show cause notice under Section 73 of CGST Act before raising recovery with interest and penalty. The Revenue was directed to follow prescribed statutory procedures, including issuing a show cause notice and providing an opportunity for representation, while keeping other substantive legal issues regarding Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules open for future adjudication.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Accused in GST Fraud Case Secures Bail Despite Ongoing Investigation, Court Finds Insufficient Direct Evidence
Case-Laws
GST
HC granted regular bail to accused in GST fraud case involving fake firms and fraudulent input tax credit. Despite ongoing investigation and allegations under CGST Act Sections 132(1)(c), 132(1)(b), and 132(1)(i), the court found insufficient evidence directly linking accused to firm management. Considering potential trial duration, absence of substantive evidence, and low flight risk given official witnesses, the court deemed continued detention unproductive. Bail was allowed subject to furnishing requisite bonds and compliance with trial court's conditions, without expressing opinion on case merits.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Legal Rectification Ordered: Section 73 Application Remanded for Fresh Hearing Within 6 Weeks, Previous Orders Set Aside
Case-Laws
GST
HC remanded the matter back to the proper officer for reconsideration of the rectification application under section 73, directing a fresh hearing within 6 weeks. The court set aside previous orders by the appellate authority and proper officer, mandating completion of the adjudicatory process by departmental authorities prior to appellate review. The writ petition was disposed of without examining the case merits, and the allegations in the petition were not deemed admitted by the respondents.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST Appeal Sent Back for Procedural Correction, Ensuring Fair Review and Proper Notification Process
Case-Laws
GST
HC remanded the GST-related appeal back to the Appellate Authority due to procedural irregularities in order notification. The court directed that the original show-cause notice and adjudication order be reissued in the petitioner's name, and mandated uploading of all related orders on the petitioner's portal. The appeal will be reassessed by a different officer to ensure fair review, addressing the technical deficiencies in the initial proceedings without prejudicing the petitioner's substantive rights.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Assessment Challenge Dismissed: Procedural Fairness Upheld, Appeal Rights Preserved with 25% Tax Payment Condition
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax assessment order, finding no violation of natural justice. The court noted that the tax authority provided adequate opportunities for hearing and response prior to issuing the assessment order. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal after offering to pay 25% of the disputed tax amount. The appellate authority was directed to consider the potential appeal on its merits, providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner without strict adherence to limitation periods. The dismissal was without costs, with connected miscellaneous petitions also being closed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST largest marginal contributor to rising poverty in Pakistan: World Bank
GST
Dated:- 25-5-2025
PTI
Islamabad, May 25 (PTI) The General Sales Tax has the largest marginal contribution to the rise of poverty while a monthly cash transfer programme to the poorest families has the largest positive impact on inequality reduction in Pakistan, a World Bank study has said.
‘The Effects of Taxes and Transfers on Inequality and Poverty in Pakistan’ reports that the General Sales Tax (GST) payments account for over 7 per cent households’ pre-tax expenditure, which leads to further impoverishment among poor and vulnerable households.
Dawn reported on Sunday quoting the World Bank (WB) study that estimations of the marginal contributio

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

mprove its domestic revenue mobilisation and public expenditure efficiency to generate greater fiscal space. The additional fiscal space should be prioritised to expand social expenditure and targetted transfers and to improve fiscal equity.
The report recommends expenditure reforms to improve the accessibility and quality of public health and education services in Pakistan, which could have long-term impacts in terms of poverty and inequality reduction.
It also finds faults with the taxation system of the country, which it claimed emphasises revenue collection from “more frequently impoverishing indirect taxes as well as regressive and inefficient subsidy expenditures” while de-prioritising progressive direct taxation.
The report fur

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Procedural Errors Invalidate Goods Seizure: Authorities Must Follow Strict GST Act Protocols for Proper Enforcement
Case-Laws
GST
HC invalidated goods seizure due to procedural non-compliance with GST Act. The court directed authorities to: (i) issue Section 129(3) notice within two days, (ii) ascertain tax documents within three days, (iii) provide notice and opportunity to petitioner, (iv) release petitioner's goods under Section 129(1), and (v) initiate Section 130 proceedings only after completing prescribed steps. The ruling emphasized strict adherence to legal procedures and mandated that tax authorities must follow proper protocols during goods confiscation, highlighting the need for systematic training and procedural sensitization among enforcement officers.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Petitioner's Rectification Plea Dismissed, Appeal Window Open Under Section 107 of CGST Act Until July 10, 2025
Case-Laws
GST
HC rejected the rectification application, finding no procedural fault by the Respondent-Department. The Court held that the petitioner failed to provide substantive reasoning in the application. While granting time until 10th July, 2025 to file an appeal under Section 107 of CGST Act, the Court left open the issue of notification validity, subject to pending Supreme Court and High Court decisions in related matters. The petitioner was advised to pursue remedies through the appellate authority, with the final determination contingent on ongoing judicial proceedings.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Areca Nuts Seizure: Administrative Response Clarified, Petitioner Directed to Seek Provisional Release Through Proper Channels
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the writ petition involving seizure of areca nuts consignment. The court clarified that the communication dated 6th May, 2025 was merely a response to the petitioner's earlier letter and not an adjudication order. The court directed GST Department to issue a Show Cause Notice in accordance with law and allowed the petitioner to seek provisional release of goods through the appropriate adjudicating authority. The petition was disposed of without granting immediate relief, leaving further procedural steps to administrative authorities.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Judicial Intervention Mandates Fresh Review of Tax Refund Claim, Ensuring Fair Hearing and Potential Full Credit
Case-Laws
GST
HC set aside the appellate authority's order dated 11th December, 2023 rejecting the petitioner's refund application. The court remanded the matter for fresh hearing, directing the appellate authority to conduct a de novo review within three weeks, assign a different officer, and provide the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. If the refund is found valid, the entire amount must be credited to the petitioner's ledger with appropriate statutory interest. The court criticized the respondents' procedural approach, highlighting the petitioner's registration restoration and subsequent refund claim's unjust rejection.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

High Court Strikes Down GST Assessment Order for Procedural Flaws, Mandates Proper Documentation and Signature Compliance
Case-Laws
GST
HC invalidated the GST assessment order due to procedural irregularities, specifically the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN) and the assessing officer's signature. The court set aside the original assessment order in Form GST DRC-07 and the related bank attachment order. The 1st respondent was granted liberty to conduct a fresh assessment after providing proper notice and ensuring appropriate signature. The limitation period is to be calculated excluding the time between the original assessment order and the court's current ruling. No costs were awarded.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Tax Show Cause Notice Upheld: Fraud Allegations Need Substantive Content, Not Exact Statutory Wording for Extended Limitation
Case-Laws
GST
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax show cause notice, holding that allegations of fraud or misstatement need not precisely mirror statutory language to invoke extended limitation under Section 74. The court found the notice's allegations sufficiently substantive and non-supply of a specific document does not automatically vitiate proceedings. The petitioner retains right to raise substantive arguments in appellate proceedings, with the dismissal focusing on procedural maintainability of the writ petition under Article 226. The court explicitly preserved the petitioner's right to contest merits before the appellate authority.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =