Goods and Services Tax

Alternate statutory remedy governs GST assessment challenge, with statutory appeal preserved and limitation objection barred for the permitted filing period.
Case-Laws
GST
Alternate statutory remedy was central to the GST challenge against an assessment order issued under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act for financial year 2018-19, raising issues of the Section 6(2)(b) bar and proper-officer jurisdiction. The High Court rejected the writ petition while allowing recourse to the statutory appeal. The Supreme Court declined to entertain the special leave petition but allowed a further 30 days to file the appeal without a limitation objection. All contentions, including the pre-deposit issue in light of payment under parallel Central Act proceedings, remain open.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Blocked input tax credit cannot satisfy GST appeal pre-deposit while credit restrictions continue, preserving appellate access after corrections.
Case-Laws
GST
Blocked input tax credit subject to a subsisting Rule 86A restriction cannot be debited, treated as payment, or appropriated towards the mandatory pre-deposit for a GST appeal. The restriction may be challenged or sought to be modified before the competent forum. An erroneous FORM GST DRC-07 attributable to the adjudicating authority, once rectified, should not deprive the taxpayer of the statutory appellate remedy. Electronic filing of the appeal must be enabled, with manual filing available if portal issues persist, subject to compliance with the prescribed pre-deposit.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Statutory appellate remedy before a functional GST Tribunal displaces writ proceedings while preserving limitation protection for prior litigation.
Case-Laws
GST
Availability of a statutory appellate remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal requires a challenge to a GST penalty order to proceed through that forum once it becomes functional. A writ petition entertained solely because the appellate forum was non-functional need not continue after the Tribunal is operational. The petitioner may be relegated to the Tribunal with liberty to file an appeal within the stipulated period, and the Tribunal should not object to limitation for the period during which the writ petition was pursued. The appeal is to be decided in accordance with law after considering any interim order.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Post-decisional hearing for blocked electronic credit ledgers requires reasoned review of disputed input tax credit claims
Case-Laws
GST
Blocking an Electronic Credit Ledger may be based on reasons to believe that input tax credit was fraudulently availed or is ineligible, including where suppliers are alleged to be non-existent or their registrations cancelled. Even where such statutory conditions are prima facie met, audi alteram partem requires a post-decisional hearing. The affected taxpayer must be allowed to submit a detailed representation and supporting records to substantiate the credit claim. The competent authority must grant a personal hearing and issue a reasoned, speaking determination independently of prior observations, without merits being conclusively adjudicated at the blocking stage.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Blocked input tax credit cannot fund an appellate pre-deposit while a valid electronic credit ledger restriction continues.
Case-Laws
GST
Blocked input tax credit cannot be used for an appellate pre-deposit while a valid Rule 86A restriction prohibits debit of the electronic credit ledger. Section 49(4) permits use of ledger credit towards output-tax payments only subject to prescribed conditions and restrictions; it therefore creates no absolute right to use blocked credit for pre-deposit. Rule 86A operates provisionally, requires recorded reasons for the restriction, and permits an unblocking application when the grounds no longer subsist. The unblocking request must be considered expeditiously, with a speaking order and reasonable opportunity before any proposed rejection.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic credit ledger blocking remains permissible for determined GST recovery despite an interim stay on debiting available credit.
Case-Laws
GST
Post-determination recovery of determined GST dues may include blocking, including negative blocking, of the electronic credit ledger. The interim protection against recovery restricts only debit of credit already lying in the ledger towards recovery; it does not invalidate or suspend a prior ledger-blocking order. Recovery powers extend to prescribed modes involving money or goods under the proper officer's control, third-party recovery, distraint and sale of assets, and assistance from revenue authorities. Rule 86A governs provisional pre-determination blocking and does not limit post-determination recovery action. Electronic credit ledger blocking therefore remains permissible, subject to the protection against debit of available credit during the interim stay.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Interim protection from arrest allowed GST investigation questioning to proceed while requiring appearance before the Investigating Officer.
Case-Laws
GST
Interim protection from arrest during a GST investigation was granted to a person summoned in connection with alleged GST and input tax credit fraud. The investigating side confirmed that the relevant notices required attendance for interrogation and did not authorise arrest. The person was therefore directed to appear before the Investigating Officer in accordance with the notices, while receiving protection from arrest in the related criminal proceedings. The protection was limited to facilitating interrogation under the issued notices.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST rectification for patent errors cannot reopen ineligible input tax credit findings; challenges to the original determination remain available.
Case-Laws
GST
Rectification of patent errors in GST proceedings is confined to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to revisit an original determination on under-declared ineligible input tax credit. Where no apparent error is established and supporting documents were not submitted, rejection of a rectification application remains undisturbed. The taxpayer may challenge the original determination independently in accordance with law, rather than seek substantive reconsideration through rectification.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit apportionment rectification under Section 161 requires correction of SOP-related mistakes by the proper officer.
Case-Laws
GST
Rectification of a mistake in apportioning available input tax credit under the SOP was directed through Section 161 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The proper officer must rectify the identified ITC-apportionment error under the applicable SOP. Following the rectification order, the affected party may pursue an appropriate appeal.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Condonation of GST appeal delay through writ jurisdiction enables merits review despite statutory appellate limitation.
Case-Laws
GST
Condonation of delay in filing a GST appeal was granted in writ jurisdiction despite the Appellate Authority's statutory inability to extend the limitation under section 107 of the RGST/CGST Act. Delay attributable to circumstances beyond the petitioner's control, coupled with the grave prejudice arising from refusal of merits review, justified relief. The High Court directed the Appellate Authority to entertain and decide the appeal on merits, subject to filing within the stipulated period.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reversed excess input tax credit and available ledger balance require fresh adjudication before recovery of the disputed demand.
Case-Laws
GST
Excess input tax credit demand required reconsideration because the disputed credit had been reversed and surplus credit remained in the Electronic Credit Ledger. The High Court quashed the demand order, which had confirmed the show-cause notice without a reply, and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication on merits. The taxpayer must file a reply to the show-cause notice with supporting documents within the stipulated period; otherwise, recovery may proceed in accordance with law.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Personal hearing after a GST reply is essential where an adverse adjudication order may follow.
Case-Laws
GST
GST adjudication requires consideration of the taxpayer's reply to the show-cause notice and a further opportunity of personal hearing before an adverse order is made on that reply. Inconsistent dates in the adjudication order and its annexure supported the inference that the subsequently filed reply had not been considered. The High Court set aside the adjudication and appellate orders and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after personal hearing, subject to the stipulated further deposit. The original adjudication order would revive if the taxpayer failed to cooperate.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Statutory Limitation in GST Assessments invalidates notices, assessment orders and recovery action issued beyond the prescribed deadline.
Case-Laws
GST
Statutory limitation under Section 73(2) of the Telangana GST Act governed the validity of the show-cause notice and assessment orders for financial year 2020-21. Issuance of the notice after the prescribed deadline, followed by assessment orders beyond the applicable cut-off, constituted a jurisdictional error. The time-barred proceedings, including the consequential recovery notice, were therefore set aside.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Mandatory GST appellate pre-deposit remains payable despite tax payment during adjudication, preserving appeal subject to delay condonation.
Case-Laws
GST
GST appellate remedy requires the statutory pre-deposit even where tax dues were paid during adjudication proceedings. Payment of the disputed tax, or a challenge to the correctness of tax or penalty, does not dispense with this filing condition; those issues must be determined on the appeal's merits. The petitioner could pursue the statutory appeal only after making the prescribed deposit and filing a delay-condonation application. The appellate authority was directed to consider the delay application sympathetically and, if satisfied, decide the appeal on merits.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Voluntary excess ITC reversal before notice ends further interest liability after revenue verifies the taxpayer's claim.
Case-Laws
GST
Voluntary reversal of excess input tax credit, with applicable interest, before issuance of a demand-cum-show-cause notice eliminates further interest liability under section 73 of the CGST Act where revenue records verify the claim. The taxpayer's reversal was accepted as genuine, resulting in the first appellate order being set aside and the appeal being allowed. Any necessary demand appropriation must be issued by the proper officer within one month of communication.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit fraud permits Section 74 recovery where invoices and payments do not prove receipt of goods.
Case-Laws
GST
Input tax credit claimed on invoices issued by non-existent suppliers may attract Section 74 where the notice sets out foundational facts indicating fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression. The claimant must establish actual receipt and physical movement of goods; invoices and banking records alone do not prove transaction genuineness. A consolidated notice may cover multiple financial years because the statutory wording permits proceedings for connected periods. Conversely, reverse charge liability cannot be pursued under Section 74 merely from omissions when relevant expenses were disclosed in accounts and financial statements; deliberate non-disclosure is required. Input tax credit mismatch and reverse charge demands were sustained under Section 73 with consequential interest and penalty, while fraudulent credit demands were restored under Section 74.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

IAAPI Calls for GST Rationalisation to Support Growth and Consumer Demand in India’s Amusement Industry
GST
Dated:- 3-9-2026
PTI
Industry survey highlights strong support for a 5% GST rate without ITC, with operators expecting lower ticket prices, higher footfalls and fresh investments New Delhi, September 2026: For families looking to spend a weekend at an amusement park, water park or indoor entertainment centre, ticket prices are often an important part of the decision. For the businesses operating these attractions, however, the equation is more complex. High operating costs, significant investments in infrastructure and changing consumer spending patterns continue to put pressure on the industry.

Against this backdrop, the Indian Association of Amusement Parks and Industries (IAAPI) is calling for a more rational GST structure for the amusement industry. The association believes that bringing down the GST burden can help make entertainment more affordable for con

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

y operators, particularly smaller and mid-sized businesses, the current GST structure adds to the pressure on an already capital-intensive business. A more rational rate can create a win-win situation — consumers can benefit through more affordable tickets, while operators can focus on improving their facilities, creating new experiences and expanding their businesses.” Notably, overwhelming majority (approx. 80%) of the visitors to amusement parks belong to middle and lower-middle-class households, the very demographic that the GST 2.0 reforms sought to protect. Present GST rate adversely impacts footfall, muting customer demand.

Amusement parks are an integral part of the tourism industry and contribute significantly to the growth of tourism, employment, local businesses, and the overall economy. However, the sector is treated unequally compared with other important components of the tourism industry, such as hotels and airlines. Hotel accommodation with room rent up to ?7,5

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

cted impact goes beyond ticket prices. 64.9% of operators identified increased customer demand as a key benefit of a 5% GST rate, while 62.3% expect facility expansion, 61% anticipate revenue growth and 54.5% see the possibility of new investments in projects.

What stands out from the survey is that the industry is not looking at GST rationalization simply as a way to improve margins. Operators are looking at it as an opportunity to attract more customers, reinvest in their facilities and build a stronger amusement ecosystem.” IAAPI believes that a simpler and more rational GST structure can support the industry's growth while making leisure and entertainment more accessible to consumers. The association will continue to engage with policymakers and stakeholders, using industry data and member feedback to make a constructive case for GST reform.

(Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with NRDPL and PTI takes no editorial responsibility for the

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Omission of GST refund restriction rule ends its application to proceedings pending on its omission date.
Circulars
GST
Omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules without a saving clause applies to all proceedings pending on the date of omission, preventing the rule's restrictions from governing those matters. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act does not preserve pending proceedings after omission of a rule; their continuation requires an express saving provision or a statutory legal device. Unlike the Central Excise and Customs laws, GST law contains no comparable saving clause. CBIC may accept the Supreme Court's stated position.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Security-based bail conditions for alleged tax liabilities were modified when disclosed family assets could secure the alleged dues.
Case-Laws
GST
Bail conditions requiring a security bond equivalent to alleged tax and penalty liability may be modified where the accused stands on the same footing as a co-accused whose condition was found onerous and vague. Disclosed family assets, supported by affidavit, may constitute security instead of the stipulated bond. The impugned security-bond requirement was not to be enforced, and the declared family assets were treated as security for the alleged dues.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reasonable cause protects service-tax defaulters from Section 78 penalties when departmental guidance creates genuine interpretational uncertainty.
Case-Laws
GST
Reasonable cause under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 can shield an assessee from penalty under Section 78 for non-payment of service tax where contemporaneous departmental communications supported a bona fide belief that consultancy services provided to Government institutions were non-taxable. Interpretational uncertainty, the Department's initial view, and the absence of fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression with intent to evade, or deliberate default support reasonable cause. Service tax for the normal limitation period and applicable interest remained payable, but the Section 78 penalty was set aside.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST refund restriction omission applies to pending proceedings, requiring related notices, orders and refund claims to be processed accordingly.
Case-Laws
GST
Omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, effective from 8 October 2024, applies to all pending proceedings and extends its benefit to affected assessees. The Supreme Court upheld this position, settling challenges concerning the deleted provision. Pending matters involving notices, orders-in-original, consequential refund claims and remittances must therefore be processed in accordance with the omission and applicable law. Challenges pending before High Courts are to be placed before the appropriate roster courts for orders consistent with the settled position.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit for leased construction requires binding precedent consideration; unlawful ledger recovery must be reversed.
Case-Laws
GST
Input tax credit claims for construction intended to be leased or licensed require consideration of the principle that such construction is not undertaken on the taxable person's own account. Assessment findings rejecting a leasing-based claim without applying the Supreme Court ruling in Safari Retreats required fresh consideration; the assessment and consequential DRC-07 orders were set aside without deciding ITC entitlement on merits. Recovery by debiting electronic cash or credit ledgers also required prior electronic intimation in Form GST DRC-01D and seven days to pay under Rule 142B. Non-compliant recoveries were to be re-credited or refunded after the underlying assessments were set aside.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Retrospective input tax credit protection overrides delayed-return limits, requiring reconsideration where statutory eligibility under Section 16(5) is met.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 16(5) of the CGST Act, inserted retrospectively, grants input tax credit to taxpayers who furnished returns by its prescribed cut-off date, notwithstanding the time limit in Section 16(4). A circular cannot restrict that statutory entitlement. A notification requiring a rectification application within a specified period does not govern a taxpayer who had already filed an appeal against the assessment order before the amendment. Denial of March 2020 input tax credit and consequential demands therefore require reconsideration under Section 16(5), subject to other eligibility conditions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic gift vouchers can validly pass GST rate-reduction benefits when unconditional, traceable e-wallet credits reach identified customers.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 171 permits GST rate-reduction benefits to be passed through electronic gift vouchers where e-wallet credits carry monetary value, are unconditional, have no expiry or usage restrictions, and are traceable to identified customers, invoices and supplies. System-generated labels such as “Offers and cashback” do not negate the documented link to the benefit. Benefits not traceable to identifiable recipients remain unpassed; after accounting for cancelled or returned supplies, the residual amount must be deposited in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund with applicable interest. The anti-profiteering penalty provision does not apply to conduct occurring before it came into force, so no penalty is leviable for that earlier period.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax evasion.
Case-Laws
GST
GST treatment of school-affiliation, annual registration and late-registration charges turns on whether services directly relate to admission to or conduct of examinations. Affiliation and related administrative charges are treated as independent taxable supplies, with the examination-services exemption construed strictly; affiliation regularisation remains limited to its specified period. A consolidated show cause notice may cover multiple tax periods absent prejudice or jurisdictional defect. GST Council-based circulars on affiliation remain binding on departmental authorities. Amounts collected without separately charging GST require cum-tax valuation. Extended limitation requires affirmative proof of fraud, wilful misstatement or deliberate suppression with intent to evade tax; non-payment and delayed registration alone are insufficient. Interest and penalties survive only to the extent of sustained tax demands.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =