Goods and Services Tax

GST appeal pre-deposit follows the law when adjudication begins, while factual penalty challenges belong before statutory appellate authorities.
Case-Laws
GST
GST appeal pre-deposit requirements are governed by the law in force when adjudicatory proceedings commence; consequently, appeals arising from show-cause notices issued before 1 October 2025 remain subject to the earlier Section 107(6) regime despite later Orders-in-Original. A proper officer's authority for penalty proceedings is function-specific, but objections concerning officer competence, evidentiary material, hearing, cross-examination, penalty quantification and individual noticees' roles require record-based examination through the statutory appeal. Writ jurisdiction is not invoked where that appellate remedy is complete and efficacious. Whether Section 122(1) applies to a person who is not a taxable person remains unresolved.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST payment representations require record-based, reasoned decisions while substantive entitlement remains open for determination by competent authorities.
Case-Laws
GST
Pending representations seeking GST payment for road construction and improvement works require examination of tender conditions, individual bills and invoices, payments already made, and applicable GST liability. The asserted inclusion of GST in final bills requires a proper and intelligible breakup of amounts paid. High Court required the competent authorities to independently consider the supporting records and issue reasoned speaking orders within the stipulated period. The claimant's substantive entitlement to GST was left open for determination in accordance with law.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Show cause notice limits bar adjudication from confirming demands beyond those proposed, requiring fresh adjudication without a new notice.
Case-Laws
GST
Section 75(7) of the UPGST Act prohibits confirmation of a tax demand exceeding the amount proposed in the show cause notice. An adjudication order confirming higher demands on both disputed counts therefore contains a fundamental and incurable defect. The order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication, without allowing issuance of a fresh notice.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Inverted duty refunds cover higher-taxed packing materials used for packaged tea despite an inapplicable GST rate-reduction circular.
Case-Laws
GST
Refund of accumulated input tax credit under the inverted duty structure extends to higher-taxed packing materials used for marketing packaged tea. Section 54(3)(ii) applies where input tax rates exceed the output supply rate, and the plural term “inputs” does not distinguish between principal and ancillary inputs. Packing materials used in the course or furtherance of business therefore qualify as eligible inputs, notwithstanding that bulk tea and packaged tea attract the same GST rate. Circular No. 135/5/2020-GST addresses credit accumulation caused by GST-rate reductions on the same goods over time; it does not cover accumulation arising from higher-taxed packing materials and cannot curtail a refund otherwise available under the Act.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Pure-agent electricity recovery excludes actual, unmarked-up metered and common-area charges from the taxable value of premises maintenance services.
Case-Laws
GST
Actual electricity charges separately recovered at the same amount charged by the electricity distribution company, without markup, are treated as pure-agent recoveries under clause 3.3 of Circular No. 206/18/2023-GST. Electricity supplied with premises maintenance is ordinarily ancillary to the maintenance service and forms part of a composite supply despite separate billing. The circular's deeming rule nevertheless applies to separately metered HVAC and non-HVAC consumption and proportionately allocated common-area consumption recovered at actual cost. Those recoveries are excluded from the value of the maintenance service and do not attract GST, even where the independent pure-agent test is not otherwise met.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Prior adjudication bars advance-ruling applications on identical GST classification and rate questions concerning the applicant.
Case-Laws
GST
The first proviso to section 98(2) bars admission of an advance-ruling application where the question raised is already pending or has been decided in proceedings under the GST Act concerning the applicant. Classification and applicable-rate questions for dried and cured tobacco leaves had already been decided in enforcement proceedings involving the applicant. The application for advance ruling was therefore rejected as inadmissible.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of ruled paper sheets keeps them under Heading 4802; notebook-use exemption depends on actual manufacture.
Case-Laws
GST
Ruled or lined loose paper sheets produced by cutting uncoated paper remain within Heading 4802, rather than Heading 4820, because loose sheets cut to size are excluded from the finished-stationery heading. Paper is classified under tariff item 48026190 in rolls and 48026290 in sheets. The end-use exemption for paper used in specified notebooks depends on actual use by the manufacturer; supplies through intermediaries remain independently taxable. Recipients of uncoated paper reels have no reverse-charge liability because the goods are not notified for reverse charge, while input tax credit remains subject to statutory conditions. Documentary requirements cannot be imposed where the exemption notification does not prescribe them.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

End-use GST exemption for uncoated paper depends on proven manufacture of specified books, while other uses remain taxable.
Case-Laws
GST
End-use-based GST exemption for uncoated paper and paperboard under tariff heading 4802 depends on established actual use in manufacturing exercise books, graph books, laboratory notebooks or notebooks. Classification turns on actual use rather than intended use, paper grade or specifications; supplies used for other purposes remain taxable. Questions on supplier verification, documentary requirements and liability for a purchaser's misuse fall outside an advance ruling on notification applicability where the notification contains no such mechanisms. Revised Central and corresponding State GST rate entries take effect from 22.09.2025, leaving no stated ambiguity on the rate transition date.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Enabling Filing of Appeals in Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount
GST
Dated:- 7-9-2026

In cases where a dispute regarding liability exists but the demand amount is reflected as “NIL” or “Zero” in the demand order, and payment has been made by the taxpayer prior to the issuance of the demand order, the previous validation restricting the filing of an appeal against such demand orders has been removed from the GST Portal. Accordingly, taxpayers are now enabled to file an appeal

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Expiry of a CGST prohibition order requires release of detained goods without affecting the underlying departmental investigation.
Case-Laws
GST
Expiry of the extended six-month validity of a CGST prohibition order causes it to cease automatically, without requiring separate revocation. Goods detained solely under that order cannot remain under detention after expiry and must be released. Release of the goods does not affect the legality of the departmental investigation or the evidentiary material already collected, which remain available for the investigation.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Composite show-cause notices spanning multiple financial years are jurisdictionally invalid, allowing writ review despite an alternative appellate remedy.
Case-Laws
GST
Under the 2017 Act, a single show-cause notice covering multiple financial years is impermissible because limitation applies independently to each year and cannot be bypassed by clubbing years. Separate year-wise demands raised under such a notice do not cure the jurisdictional defect. A notice issued without or in excess of statutory jurisdiction may be challenged through writ jurisdiction despite an available appellate remedy where the defect is apparent on its face and requires no factual inquiry. The composite notice, consequential order-in-original and related steps were quashed, while revenue authorities remained free to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Inverted duty refunds cover higher-taxed packaging inputs for packaged tea, while rate-reduction guidance does not bar claims.
Case-Laws
GST
Packing materials, labels, cartons and plastic containers used to market packaged tea qualify as inputs used in the course or furtherance of business and may generate refundable accumulated input tax credit under the inverted duty structure. The refund analysis does not distinguish between principal and ancillary inputs, and identical GST rates on bulk and packaged tea do not exclude credit arising from higher-taxed packing materials. The rate-reduction circular concerning accumulation caused by GST-rate changes on the same goods does not apply where accumulation arises from packing materials, and it cannot restrict a refund otherwise available under the statute. The refund sanction was sustained and the Revenue appeal was dismissed.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Inverted duty refunds include packaging inputs where administrative circulars cannot restrict statutory input tax credit entitlement.
Case-Laws
GST
Refund of unutilised input tax credit under an inverted duty structure extends to packing materials, labels, cartons and plastic containers used to market packaged tea. Section 54(3)(ii) treats such materials as inputs and does not distinguish between principal and ancillary inputs; comparison of bulk tea and packaged tea without considering packaging inputs is therefore incorrect. Circular No. 135/5/2020-GST addresses credit accumulation caused by a rate reduction on the same goods at different times and does not apply where bulk and packaged tea bear the same tax rate. Administrative circulars cannot add to or curtail the statutory refund entitlement.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit mismatch requires transaction-level verification; demands must remain within show-cause notice and applicable verification periods.
Case-Laws
GST
Input tax credit denial based solely on a GSTR-2A/GSTR-3B mismatch requires transaction-level verification of reconciliations, invoices, records and supplier-tax-payment conditions; a mismatch alone does not establish ineligibility. Section 16(2)(aa) does not apply to the disputed period, while Rule 36(4) must be applied as operative during each relevant portion. Tax demands must remain within the grounds and tax heads proposed in the show-cause notice, supported by a reasoned computation and factual basis. The CBIC ITC-verification mechanism applies only from April 2019 to 8 October 2019, requiring separate examination of later periods under the applicable substantive provisions.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Fraudulent GST registrations using misused PAN and Aadhaar credentials require stronger identity-verification safeguards and preventive measures.
Case-Laws
GST
Fraudulent GST registrations obtained through misuse of PAN and Aadhaar particulars require effective preventive measures. The High Court granted the Commissioners responsible for central and state GST administration and the Commissioner of Police a final opportunity to devise a solution to curb registrations secured by another person using a taxpayer's identity credentials. The focus is on strengthening safeguards against identity-based GST registration fraud.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Alternate statutory remedy governs GST assessment challenge, with statutory appeal preserved and limitation objection barred for the permitted filing period.
Case-Laws
GST
Alternate statutory remedy was central to the GST challenge against an assessment order issued under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act for financial year 2018-19, raising issues of the Section 6(2)(b) bar and proper-officer jurisdiction. The High Court rejected the writ petition while allowing recourse to the statutory appeal. The Supreme Court declined to entertain the special leave petition but allowed a further 30 days to file the appeal without a limitation objection. All contentions, including the pre-deposit issue in light of payment under parallel Central Act proceedings, remain open.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Blocked input tax credit cannot satisfy GST appeal pre-deposit while credit restrictions continue, preserving appellate access after corrections.
Case-Laws
GST
Blocked input tax credit subject to a subsisting Rule 86A restriction cannot be debited, treated as payment, or appropriated towards the mandatory pre-deposit for a GST appeal. The restriction may be challenged or sought to be modified before the competent forum. An erroneous FORM GST DRC-07 attributable to the adjudicating authority, once rectified, should not deprive the taxpayer of the statutory appellate remedy. Electronic filing of the appeal must be enabled, with manual filing available if portal issues persist, subject to compliance with the prescribed pre-deposit.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Statutory appellate remedy before a functional GST Tribunal displaces writ proceedings while preserving limitation protection for prior litigation.
Case-Laws
GST
Availability of a statutory appellate remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal requires a challenge to a GST penalty order to proceed through that forum once it becomes functional. A writ petition entertained solely because the appellate forum was non-functional need not continue after the Tribunal is operational. The petitioner may be relegated to the Tribunal with liberty to file an appeal within the stipulated period, and the Tribunal should not object to limitation for the period during which the writ petition was pursued. The appeal is to be decided in accordance with law after considering any interim order.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Post-decisional hearing for blocked electronic credit ledgers requires reasoned review of disputed input tax credit claims
Case-Laws
GST
Blocking an Electronic Credit Ledger may be based on reasons to believe that input tax credit was fraudulently availed or is ineligible, including where suppliers are alleged to be non-existent or their registrations cancelled. Even where such statutory conditions are prima facie met, audi alteram partem requires a post-decisional hearing. The affected taxpayer must be allowed to submit a detailed representation and supporting records to substantiate the credit claim. The competent authority must grant a personal hearing and issue a reasoned, speaking determination independently of prior observations, without merits being conclusively adjudicated at the blocking stage.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Blocked input tax credit cannot fund an appellate pre-deposit while a valid electronic credit ledger restriction continues.
Case-Laws
GST
Blocked input tax credit cannot be used for an appellate pre-deposit while a valid Rule 86A restriction prohibits debit of the electronic credit ledger. Section 49(4) permits use of ledger credit towards output-tax payments only subject to prescribed conditions and restrictions; it therefore creates no absolute right to use blocked credit for pre-deposit. Rule 86A operates provisionally, requires recorded reasons for the restriction, and permits an unblocking application when the grounds no longer subsist. The unblocking request must be considered expeditiously, with a speaking order and reasonable opportunity before any proposed rejection.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Electronic credit ledger blocking remains permissible for determined GST recovery despite an interim stay on debiting available credit.
Case-Laws
GST
Post-determination recovery of determined GST dues may include blocking, including negative blocking, of the electronic credit ledger. The interim protection against recovery restricts only debit of credit already lying in the ledger towards recovery; it does not invalidate or suspend a prior ledger-blocking order. Recovery powers extend to prescribed modes involving money or goods under the proper officer's control, third-party recovery, distraint and sale of assets, and assistance from revenue authorities. Rule 86A governs provisional pre-determination blocking and does not limit post-determination recovery action. Electronic credit ledger blocking therefore remains permissible, subject to the protection against debit of available credit during the interim stay.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Interim protection from arrest allowed GST investigation questioning to proceed while requiring appearance before the Investigating Officer.
Case-Laws
GST
Interim protection from arrest during a GST investigation was granted to a person summoned in connection with alleged GST and input tax credit fraud. The investigating side confirmed that the relevant notices required attendance for interrogation and did not authorise arrest. The person was therefore directed to appear before the Investigating Officer in accordance with the notices, while receiving protection from arrest in the related criminal proceedings. The protection was limited to facilitating interrogation under the issued notices.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST rectification for patent errors cannot reopen ineligible input tax credit findings; challenges to the original determination remain available.
Case-Laws
GST
Rectification of patent errors in GST proceedings is confined to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to revisit an original determination on under-declared ineligible input tax credit. Where no apparent error is established and supporting documents were not submitted, rejection of a rectification application remains undisturbed. The taxpayer may challenge the original determination independently in accordance with law, rather than seek substantive reconsideration through rectification.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Input tax credit apportionment rectification under Section 161 requires correction of SOP-related mistakes by the proper officer.
Case-Laws
GST
Rectification of a mistake in apportioning available input tax credit under the SOP was directed through Section 161 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The proper officer must rectify the identified ITC-apportionment error under the applicable SOP. Following the rectification order, the affected party may pursue an appropriate appeal.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Condonation of GST appeal delay through writ jurisdiction enables merits review despite statutory appellate limitation.
Case-Laws
GST
Condonation of delay in filing a GST appeal was granted in writ jurisdiction despite the Appellate Authority's statutory inability to extend the limitation under section 107 of the RGST/CGST Act. Delay attributable to circumstances beyond the petitioner's control, coupled with the grave prejudice arising from refusal of merits review, justified relief. The High Court directed the Appellate Authority to entertain and decide the appeal on merits, subject to filing within the stipulated period.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =