Goods and Services Tax

L&T Finance Records Highest Ever Core Profit After Tax of Rs. 760 Crore (before one-time impact of New Labour Code provision), up 21% Y-o-Y in Q3FY26
GST
Dated:- 20-1-2026
PTI
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (NewsVoir) • Highest ever Retail disbursements for the third quarter ended December 31, 2025 (Q3FY26) at Rs. 22,701 Crore, up 49% Year-on-Year (YoY) • Robust Retail franchise with a retail portfolio of Rs. 1,11,990 Crore, reflecting a 21% growth YoY • Consolidated loan book grew by 20% YoY to Rs. 1,14,285 Crore • All-time high disbursements in Two-wheeler Finance at Rs. 3,217 Crore and Farmer Finance at Rs. 2,783 Crore growing 33% YoY and 12% YoY, respectively • Net Interest Margins (NIMs)+Fees sequentially improved by 19 basis points (bps) Quarter-on-Quarter (QoQ) to 10.41% from 10.22% in the second quarter ended September 30, 2025 (Q2FY26) • Rural Business Finance business asset quality improved significantly with 0 Days Past Due (DPD) collection efficiencies reaching 99.7

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

The CompanyÂ’s Net Interest Margins (NIMs)+Fees sequentially improved by 19 basis points (bps) Quarter-on-Quarter (QoQ) to 10.41% from 10.22% in the second quarter ended September 30, 2025 (Q2FY26). The Rural Business Finance business asset quality improved significantly with 0 Days Past Due (DPD) collection efficiencies reaching 99.7% in December 2025.
The CompanyÂ’s customer-facing PLANET app, which has emerged as a powerful digital channel for customers, crossed more than 2.20 Crore downloads as of December 31, 2025, comprising more than 18.3 Lakh customers on the rural side. As of December 31, 2025, this channel has done collections of over Rs. 7,700 Crore while servicing over 10 Crore requests and has sourced loans of over Rs. 24,100 Crore.
‘Project Cyclops’ has been implemented in Two-wheeler Finance, Farm Equipment Finance, SME Finance, and Personal Loans. It will be rolled out in Home Loans and Rural Group Loans & MFI in the next financial year. ‘Project Nostradamus’ – Propr

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

owth. In Q3FY26, LTFÂ’s focus remained on delivering a standout performance across business segments. We registered the highest ever quarterly disbursements of Rs. 22,701 Crore, up 49% YoY, and the retail portfolio reaching Rs.1,11,990 Crore, reflecting a growth of 21% YoY leading to a PAT of Rs. 760 Crore, up 21% YoY (without the impact of a one-time exceptional item).
In line with our commitment to deliver a sustainable and profitable growth across quarters, we are focused on transforming LTF into a risk-first, tech-first, multi-product retail financier of choice. In line with this, we have been continuously broadening our customer acquisition funnels while sourcing creditworthy customers backed by technology and robust credit guardrails, while keeping a strong focus on collection efficiencies across businesses.
Our proprietary AI driven next-gen digital credit engine ‘Project Cyclops’ is now implemented in Personal Loans in addition to Two-wheeler, Farm Equipment, and SME Finance

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ll not only ensure a sustainable and resilient performance in the coming quarters, but also truly transform LTF into a risk-first, tech-first, diversified retail finance company.” Key Highlights: Robust Retail Franchise: The Company’s granular and deep pan-India Retail franchise is led by its strong distribution capabilities, namely, its geographic presence in around 2 Lakh villages from around 2,257 rural meeting centers/branches and 439 branches across urban centers. This extensive geographic presence is also supported by around 14,000 distribution points built over 15 years. In Q3FY26, the Company also launched its first Sampoorna Branch in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh. The Company also leverages around 2.8 Crore of its customer database to drive a credible cross-sell and up-sell franchise, contributing 40% of the Company’s repeat disbursements share in value and 48% in count during Q3FY26. The Company has a portfolio mix of 59% Urban and 41% Rural.
Building a diversified retail franchi

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ening customer acquisition channels.
Housing Loans and Loan Against Property: Q3FY26 disbursements at Rs. 2,879 Crore vs. Rs. 2,475 Crore, up 16% YoY. Book size at Rs. 28,682 Crore vs. Rs. 23,461 Crore, up 22% YoY.
SME Finance: Q3FY26 disbursements at Rs. 1,550 Crore vs. Rs. 1,249 Crore, up 24% YoY. Book size at Rs. 7,946 Crore vs. Rs. 5,817 Crore, up 37% YoY.
Gold Loan: Q3FY26 disbursements at Rs. 1,408 Crore. Book size reached Rs. 1,738 Crore. Focus remains on geo-expansion and increasing disbursement from new branches.
About L&T Finance Ltd. (LTF) L&T Finance Ltd. (LTF) (www.LTFINANCE.com), formerly known as L&T Finance Holdings Ltd. (LTFH), is a leading Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), offering a range of financial products and services. Headquartered in Mumbai, the Company has been rated ‘AAA’—the highest credit rating—by four leading domestic rating agencies. In August 2025, S&P Global Ratings upgraded LTF’s long-term Issuer Credit Rating to “BBB/Stable” from “BBB-/P

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

'Fake' GST ITC case: ED raids in multiple states
GST
Dated:- 20-1-2026
PTI
New Delhi/Kolkata, Jan 20 (PTI) The Enforcement Directorate on Tuesday conducted multi-state searches in connection with an alleged fake GST input tax credit case of Rs 658 crore that originated in Arunachal Pradesh, officials said.
Multiple premises of individuals and companies linked to the case located in Jharkhand, West Bengal and Manipur are being searched as part of an investigation being undertaken as

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Belated input tax credit claims under retrospective Sections 16(5)-16(6) and GSTR-2A/GSTR-3B mismatch; orders quashed, reassessed
Case-Laws
GST
Belated availing of input tax credit: statutory amendment inserting Sections 16(5)-16(6) (Finance Act 2024, retrospective to 01.07.2017) governs late ITC claims, requiring re-adjudication in favour of the assessee on that legal point – outcome: reassessment on merits. Mismatch between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B: factual discrepancy must be re-examined by the original authority after hearing the petitioner – outcome: impugned assessment orders quashed and matter remitted. Interim relief conditioned: petitioner to deposit 50% of disputed tax in cash from electronic cash ledger within 30 days; bank attachment to be lifted subject to deposit and no other arrears, failure permitting recovery as if petition dismissed. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Blocking electronic input tax credit u/r 86A requires independent reasoned satisfaction; authority directed to pass fresh speaking order
Case-Laws
GST
Issue: Whether blocking electronic input tax credit under Rule 86A was predicated on an independent, reasoned satisfaction or on a mechanical/borrowed conclusion. Reasoning: The court held that Rule 86A requires an independent application of mind and a speaking order; reliance on the Board's Circular dated 02.11.2021 does not permit a mere mechanical exercise or borrowed satisfaction. Outcome: The tax authority was directed to pass a fresh reasoned speaking order complying with Rule 86A, and the writ was disposed. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Legality of arrest and non-production after medical transfer in Section 132(1) case – challenge rejected
Case-Laws
GST
Dominant issue: legality of arrest and custody – Court held that illegal arrest may be challenged by writ only where arrest flagrantly breaches procedural safeguards or is mala fide; ordinarily bail provisions govern custody, and judicial scrutiny focuses on material justifying arrest. Outcome: challenge rejected because arrest was supported by material establishing reason to believe an offence under Section 132(1) was made out. Dominant issue: non-production within 24 hours – Court found non-production excused by exigent medical transfer and not contrary to statutory requirements or instructions, so this plea failed. Petition dismissed. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Jurisdiction to issue show-cause notice u/s74 CGST/MGST after para 2 of Notification No.11/2017 struck down; reply affidavit ordered
Case-Laws
GST
Whether the issuing authority had jurisdiction to serve the impugned show-cause notice under s.74 CGST/MGST, given paragraph 2 of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was declared ultra vires; court applied principles from the Supreme Court's Kusum Ingots decision on pan-India applicability to frame this as the primary jurisdictional issue – respondents ordered to file a reply affidavit within two weeks addressing whether respondent-authority possessed jurisdiction to issue the SCN, with matter listed for further hearing on the stated date. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Reverse-charge supplies treated as forward-charge GST without show-cause notice violates s.75(7); appellate order set aside and remitted
Case-Laws
GST
Notice to show-cause confines adjudication: an order cannot extend beyond issues specified in the notice and Section 75(7) manifests that principle; holding that treating reverse-charge supplies as forward-charge without such notice violated statutory mandate, and that the appellate authority erred in deeming this a mere “technical” quantification-consequence: appellate order set aside and matter remitted. Natural justice and disclosure: where the notice relies on GST back-office data within tax authorities' special knowledge, the assessee must be afforded access and an effective opportunity to meet the case-consequence: fresh show-cause/adjudication directed with necessary disclosure and hearing; limitation cannot be raised later unless available at initial notice. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Alleged GST fraud through fictitious firms and fake invoices leading to denial of anticipatory (pre-arrest) bail
Case-Laws
GST
The sole issue was entitlement to anticipatory (pre-arrest) bail where authorities allege operation of fictitious firms, issuance of fake invoices and fraudulent availment/circulation of ineligible input tax credit. Relying on ongoing nascent inquiry under notice provisions and the court's inherent jurisdiction, the High Court found specific and serious allegations, non-cooperation with investigation, risk of custodial interrogation being frustrated, tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses; consequently the petition for pre-arrest bail was dismissed. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Extraordinary writ availability when alternate statutory remedy requires pre-deposit – writ declined; petitioner ordered to file statutory appeal within six weeks
Case-Laws
GST
The court addressed whether extraordinary writ relief was maintainable where an alternate statutory remedy with a pre-deposit exists and whether the impugned order was time-barred or tainted by denial of natural justice; factual mixed-questions (service, exemption status, limitation) required adjudication and did not justify bypassing the statutory remedy. The statutory pre-deposit requirement was held not to render the remedy inefficacious. Consequently the writ was declined; petitioner directed to file the prescribed statutory appeal within six weeks after complying with pre-conditions including pre-deposit, and the appellate authority must decide the appeal on merits without disputing limitation. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

ISD distribution monthly time-limit u/r 39(1)(a) found to exceed delegated power, extinguish ITC; audit quashed
Case-Laws
GST
Rule 39(1)(a) validity: Rule 39(1)(a) impermissibly adds a mandatory monthly time-limit for ISD distribution beyond Section 20's delegated “manner” power, extinguishing vested ITC rights and violating Article 14; consequence – Rule 39(1)(a) struck down. Natural justice: audit finalization and placement before MMCM without granting requested time or hearing breached principles of natural justice; consequence – Final Audit Report and related proceedings quashed. Time limitation/suppression: show-cause issued beyond normal limitation under s.73; invocation of extended period under s.74 on alleged suppression unsustainable where returns disclosed distributions on the portal; consequence – proceedings untenable. Maintainability: writ entertained despite alternative remedy due to vires and natural-justice challenge. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Classification of repackaged rice-bran oil sold as lamp oil under competing tariff headings; writ dismissed, appeal allowed within 30 days
Case-Laws
GST
The central issue is classification of a repackaged rice bran oil marketed as lamp oil under competing tariff headings; the Court declined to determine classification, reasoning that statutory administrative and appellate fora must decide classification to secure uniformity and avoid divergent High Court rulings, and because material factual disputes require adjudication by the designated authorities. Outcome: the writ petition is dismissed, and the petitioner is granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority within 30 days. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Failure to pass Input Tax Credit to 1,104 home buyers u/s 171 CGST; ordered to remit Rs.3.13 crore
Case-Laws
GST
Dominant issue: whether the respondent violated Section 171 CGST by not passing on Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefits. Reasoning: DGAP admitted partial pass-through of ITC (Rs. 91,45,350) but also identified a prima facie computation requiring Rs. 3,12,78,937 to be passed to 1,104 eligible home buyers; despite a reporting error, the authority held the obligation to remit the larger validated sum. Outcome: respondent ordered to pay Rs. 3,12,78,937 plus interest under Section 133(3)(B) CGST, refund within three months, and file compliance report with the jurisdictional commissioner and DGAP. – AT
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

SC sets aside service tax demand from HT Media on fees paid to global speakers at summit
GST
Dated:- 16-1-2026
PTI
New Delhi, Jan 16 (PTI) The Supreme Court on Friday set aside a service tax demand raised on fees paid to international speakers invited for the Hindustan Times Leadership Summit, holding that such payments do not fall within the ambit of “event management service” under the Finance Act.
A bench comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Justice K V Viswanathan held that the fees paid to booking agents for securing international speakers for a summit cannot be taxed under the category of “event management service.” Justice Pardiwala, who authored the judgement, allowed the appeal of HT Media Limited.
The verdict dealt

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

esident Al Gore, and astronaut Jerry Linenger, to the event, HT Media entered into contracts with specialised booking agencies like the Washington Speakers Bureau and the Harry Walker Agency.
The revenue department issued show-cause notices proposing to levy service tax on the fees paid to these speakers through booking agents under the category of 'event management service', invoking the extended period of limitation.
The total tax demand involved was approximately Rs 60.56 lakh. The Commissioner confirmed the demand along with interest and penalties on February 13, 2014.
On appeal, the CESTAT partly allowed HT MediaÂ’s plea by setting aside the invocation of the extended period of limitation.
However, the CESTAT upheld the service tax

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Appellate enhancement of petitioner's taxable turnover without prior notice set aside and remitted for fresh hearing
Case-Laws
GST
Appellate enhancement of petitioner's taxable-turnover without prior notice breached natural justice because the turnover issue was not raised by the adjudicating authority and thus was not before the appellate forum; applying the second proviso to section 107(11) (Act of 2017), the appellate addition cannot stand-consequence: that portion is set aside and remitted. The appellate authority also failed to apply its mind by mechanically relying on a figure from GSTR-3B without considering corrected figures in GSTR-9/GSTR-9C; consequence: the matter is remanded for fresh consideration after affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Consolidation of short-paid GST across tax periods in Section 74 show-cause notice held ultravires; notice quashed
Case-Laws
GST
The central issue was whether a show-cause notice under Section 74 CGST could consolidate alleged short-payments across different financial years/tax periods. Relying on binding Division Bench precedent, the court held that an assessing authority lacks jurisdiction to issue composite assessment or club periods in a single notice; accordingly, such consolidation is ultravires and invalid – the September 2023 show-cause notice was quashed and set aside. The court also affirmed that a writ is maintainable where proceedings are wholly without jurisdiction, supporting the remedy granted. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST debit-note reporting mismatch causing ITC discrepancy due to GSTR-1 misclassification; portal must allow rectification and reopen filings
Case-Laws
GST
Error in reporting debit notes caused mismatch of input tax credit because the GST portal matches only buyer-acknowledged credit notes in GSTR-1 and ignores seller-entered debit notes, despite tax having been admitted and paid on those debit notes; consequence-mismatch in GSTR-2A and reversal of electronic credit balance. Legal determination: where the discrepancy is revenue-neutral and arises from misclassification in GSTR-1, the revenue must permit rectification; consequence-respondents directed to reopen the portal for amendment of GSTR-1/GSTR-3B (or accept manual amendments) and the impugned order is quashed. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Parallel adjudication by Central and State tax authorities u/s 6(2)(b) CGST barred once one authority initiates proceedings
Case-Laws
GST
The principal issue was whether Section 6(2)(b) CGST permits parallel adjudication by Central and State authorities where proceedings overlap. Relying on the Apex Court's delineation of “initiation of proceedings,” “subject-matter,” and inter-authority relations, the court held that once one authority first initiates proceedings, subsequent parallel adjudicatory proceedings by the other are barred; investigative steps not amounting to adjudication may continue. Applying that rule, no further adjudication was permitted here; the petitioner was directed to appear before the Central authority and file its response to the show-cause notice by 31.01.2026, and the petition was disposed. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Composite intimation and single DRC-01 show-cause notice across different financial years held impermissible; notices quashed
Case-Laws
GST
The court held that where the subject matter relates to different financial years, a composite intimation and single show-cause notice are impermissible: separate intimations and, after considering statutory replies, separate DRC-01 show-cause proceedings are required – consequence: the impugned intimation and show-cause notice are quashed and set aside. The court permitted respondents liberty to reinitiate proceedings lawfully and to take appropriate action on or before 15.1.2026, and directed that any adjudication thereafter be completed within a reasonable time but not later than 31.3.2026. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Refund recovery timelines u/s 56/Rule 94 considered; revision seeking relief dismissed for failure to show non-consideration
Case-Laws
GST
Whether the impugned judgment erred by not considering statutory review timelines for refund recovery under Section 56 of the WBGST Act and Rule 94 – court examined the Canon India principle that omission of a statutory provision may be an error apparent on the face of the record but found the trial court did address Section 56 (noting it reinforces the mandatory character of Section 54(7)) and considered all legal provisions and facts; consequently the challenge based on non-consideration fails and the revision is dismissed. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

BIC extends export incentives to postal shipments from 15th January 2026
GST
Dated:- 16-1-2026

Incentives expected to significantly enhance competitiveness of MSME exporters, especially from smaller towns and remote areas, and give a major fillip to postal exports
In a significant boost to India's e-commerce and MSME exports, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has extended export-related benefits under the Duty Drawback, Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products (RoDTEP) and Rebate of State and Central Taxes and Levies (RoSCTL) schemes to exports made through the postal mode in electronic form, with effect from 15th January 2026.
This landmark measure aims to provide a level playing field fo

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

toms explaining the amendments and detailing the operational modalities have been issued on 15 January 2026.
Over recent years, the Government of India has undertaken a series of policy initiatives, digital reforms and regulatory measures to transform India's e- commerce export ecosystem. A dedicated chapter titled “Promoting Cross-Border Trade in the Digital Economy” has been introduced in the Foreign Trade Policy 2023, providing a comprehensive framework to promote cross-border e-commerce through courier, post, e-commerce export hubs, Dak Niryat Kendras and other facilitative mechanisms.
India currently has 28 Foreign Post Offices (FPOs) notified under Section 7 of the Customs Act, 1962. CBIC has undertaken several measures to strengthe

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Alleged fraudulent availing and passing on of input tax credit: accused granted regular bail subject to bonds and surety
Case-Laws
GST
Whether regular bail should be granted for alleged fraudulently availed and passed on input tax credit: court noted prosecution rests on documentary evidence already seized, absence of prior similar involvement, that the offence attracts maximum five years' imprisonment and offences involving evasion up to Rs.5 crore are bailable, the matter is a magisterial trial and prolonged custody would be unproductive; accordingly the accused is entitled to bail, subject to furnishing of bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial court/duty magistrate on usual terms and conditions. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Statutory appellate forum functioning bars writ challenge to order; petitioner must comply with Section 112(8) pre-deposit and file appeal
Case-Laws
GST
Where a statutory appellate forum exists but was non-functional, the court permits writ jurisdiction to prevent remedilessness; however, once the forum is constituted, the writ court must decline relief and ensure statutory conditions for appeal (including pre-deposit requirements) are strictly observed. The petition challenging an order is therefore held non-maintainable before the writ court now that the appellate forum functions; the petitioner is directed to comply with sub-section (8) of Section 112 (pre-deposit the required amount) and file the appeal within the prescribed extended timeline, and the writ is disposed of accordingly. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

GST pre-deposit obligation u/s 112(8) for statutory appeals – petition ordered to make deposit and file appeal electronically
Case-Laws
GST
Where an alternative statutory appellate forum exists, the court held that a writ is maintainable only if that forum is non-functional or not constituted; conversely, where the forum is functional the writ court must refrain from adjudicating and insist on compliance with statutory preconditions for appeal. The court applied this principle to require strict observance of the pre-deposit obligation under Section 112(8) of the GST statute and ordered the petitioner to make the deposit (if not already made) and to file the appeal electronically within the timeline prescribed in the GSTAT e-Filing User Advisor; petition disposed. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Accumulated input tax credit refund claim blocked by portal upload of shipping bills; court orders verification and processing of refund
Case-Laws
GST
The principal issue was whether the taxpayer's refund claim for accumulated input tax credit, filed in Form GST RFD-01 after portal-size constraints prevented uploading supporting shipping bills and after earlier rejection and re-credit to the electronic credit ledger, was maintainable despite the portal error and the issuance of a deficiency memo under Rule 89(5) alleging non-debit of credit. The court found the claim substantively supported by compliance with Circular No.125/44/2019-GST and related submissions, and directed respondents to verify the enclosed documents and process the refund claim accordingly, allowing the petition. – HC
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =

Cinema ticket pricing refusing to pass GST rate cut u/s 171, found profiteering Rs.11,88,482; limited interest
Case-Laws
GST
Whether respondent violated Section 171 by not passing on GST rate reduction: Section 171 requires commensurate reduction in the all-inclusive price and state cinema regulatory ceilings or tariffs cannot justify retaining tax benefit; finding: respondent contravened Section 171 and profiteered Rs. 11,88,482 (outcome). Whether remittance of GST to the exchequer negates profiteering: statutory scheme treats consumer detriment as the test regardless of remittance; finding: GST remitted does not excuse non-passing and is included in profiteered amount (outcome). Interest and penalty: interest limited prospectively to 28.06.2019-30.06.2019 and waived in discretion; no penalty under Section 171(3A) as provision post-dates violation period (outcome). – AT
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts

= = = = = = = =

Plain text (Extract) only
For full text:-Visit the Source

= = = = = = = =