{"id":9984,"date":"2017-12-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2017-12-22T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2017-12-21T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-maa-vindhyavasini-tobacco-pvt-ltd-versus-state-of-u-p-3-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=9984","title":{"rendered":"M\/s Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of U.P. &#038; 3 Others"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of U.P. &#038; 3 Others<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (1) TMI 950 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 4 (All.)<br \/>ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 22-12-2017<br \/>WRIT TAX No. &#8211; 870 of 2017 <br \/>GST<br \/>Hon&#39;ble Bharati Sapru And Hon&#39;ble Saumitra Dayal Singh, JJ.<br \/>\nFor the Petitioner : Shubham Agrawal<br \/>\nFor the Respondent : C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nHeard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B.Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for the revenue.<br \/>\nSri Prem Shankar Prasad, Advocate has filed his appearance slip on behalf of the respondent no.2, which is taken on record.<br \/>\nThe goods have been seized on two grounds, one being discrepancy in the quantity. That discrepancy h<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=354214\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of U.P. &#038; 3 OthersGST2018 (1) TMI 950 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; 2018 (12) G. S. T. L. 4 (All.)ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 22-12-2017WRIT TAX No. &#8211; 870 of 2017 GSTHon&#39;ble Bharati Sapru And Hon&#39;ble Saumitra Dayal Singh, JJ. For the Petitioner : Shubham Agrawal &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=9984\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of U.P. &#038; 3 Others&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9984"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9984\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}