Registration in case of renting of immovable property \u2013 A curious case
By: – Srinivasan Krishnamachari
Goods and Services Tax – GST
Dated:- 28-11-2017<\/p>\n
This article is on the applicability of GST when both supplier and recipient of renting of immovable property service are located outside India but the property is situated in India
\nThe provisions for determining place of supply of services are given under sections 12 and 13 of the IGST Act.
\nSection 12 determines the place of supply of services where the location of supplier of services and the location of the recipient of services is in India. Thus, Section 12 will apply only where the location of supplier as well as the recipient is in India.
\nSimilarly, section 13 determines the place of supply of services where the location of the supplier of services or the location of the recipient of services is outside India.
\nThus, this section prescribes the provisions for determining the place of supply in case where either<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n located outside India. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n y, not being an intra-State supply and not covered elsewhere in this section, = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n we are fetched up with the original confusion on the issue of registration and taxability again. The above discussion clearly indicates that there is a lot of anomaly in the given situation and is sure to trigger a lot of litigation. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n of inter-state trade or commerce in order to enable levy and collection of IGST on imports. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n d recipient of service both being located outside India in relation to a property located in India. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n the attendant conditions and the location of the supplier, recipient and place of supply. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n as import of service as required in the Service tax days. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n another state ( Maharashtra). Taxability and credit of GST ? = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Therefore, in view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court ruling, it may not possible to create deeming fiction for levy of GST where supplier, as well as the recipient, is located outside INDIA. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Registration in case of renting of immovable property \u2013 A curious caseBy: – Srinivasan KrishnamachariGoods and Services Tax – GSTDated:- 28-11-2017 This article is on the applicability of GST when both supplier and recipient of renting of immovable property service are located outside India but the property is situated in India The provisions for determining … Continue reading “Registration in case of renting of immovable property \u2013 A curious case”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9205"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9205\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n It does not specifically mention that it will also apply if location of supplier as well as the recipient is outside India, since Section 2(11) of the IGST Act defining Import of service requires Service provider to be outside India and recipient to be in India, in addition to place of supply of service having to be in India.
\nIn the given case, there are divergent views;
\nOne view is that sine the given case would appear to be outside the purview of GST as both the supplier and recipient are outside and hence both Section 12 and 13 may be rendered irrelevant.
\nEven the charging Sections of CGST\/IGST Acts namely Sections 12 and Section 5 respectively will lose their relevance once the transaction in question is held to be outside GST.
\nThis is possibly not correct since location of Immovable property is in India and hence the place supply is the location of the immovable property in India which is a taxable supply.
\n In whose hands the said supply is taxable i<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nshall be treated to be a supply of goods or services or both in the course of inter-State trade or commerce.
\nThe given case may fall under the residual clause (c) of section 7(5) and accordingly, the supply of service may be treated as inter-state supply and provisions of IGST Act, 2017 will apply, is the said above view.
\nFrom the above discussion, one thing can be safely surmised that the intention of government is however clear to levy tax in a case where the place of supply is in India.
\nIn keeping with the above we have to reach inevitably the conclusion that Section 13 of the IGST Act has to be liberally interpreted to include the given case under it.
\n By holding this view, the problem would be, the provider of renting of Immovable property service will be required to get himself registered in India.
\nNow, paradoxically, since the supplier is liable to be registered in India, the location of supplie<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n Though it is a rare phenomenon, we still need to find a solution to the issue here and hence this article.
\nLet us try to capture the scheme of Section 7 of the IGST Act defining Inter-state supply, so that the readers will have an over view of it to understand its construct in all its ramifications.
\nSection 7(1) is devoted to inter-state trade and commerce of goods happening within the country, where the location of the supplier and recipient are in two different states to enable levy of IGST on inter-state supply of goods.
\nSection 7(2) speaks about plain import of goods so as to facilitate levy of IGST on Imports to replace the old level playing levies of CVD and SAD.
\nSection 7(3) deals with inter-state supply of Services subject to Section 12.
\nS<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nIt must be noted here that Section 7(4) carefully bears no reference to Section 12 or Section 13 for a reason, that Government reserves the right to levy tax on import of services notwithstanding the fact that the location of both the supplier and the recipient are outside India, with reference to a transaction happening under the ambit of Section 7(4) involving an Immovable property located in India.
\nBut at the same time one must also note that Section 7(2) of IGST Act does not find support for deeming exports as an interstate supply unlike in the case of Imports deemed as interstate supply in terms of Explanation to Article 269A of the Constitution (One Hundred and First) Amendment Act, 2016.
\nGovernment is empowered to make such Laws to regulate supply as it deems fit as per Article 269 A (5) of the Constitution, even as there is no specific definition for supply in the Constitution itself<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nLet us now turn to Section 13(b) of the IGST Act that relates to “services supplied to an individual, represented either as the recipient of service or a person acting on behalf of the recipient, that requires the physical presence of the recipient or the person acting on his behalf, with the supplier for the supply of services”.
\n This only means as in the case OIDAR services provided under Section 14 of the IGST Act, even if the Provider of services is not located in India but located abroad, and the service recipient is located in India, the Supplier or the person acting on his behalf, has to register and pay tax involved on the said renting of the property located in India.
\nIf no one is there on the scene of the given transaction to represent in the capacity of the Supplier, then there has to be one designated by the actual supplier located abroad to discharge the liability on his <\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nOne single factor alone does not remain important to determine the nature of a given transaction whether it is intra-state or inter-state and it particularly depends a great deal according to me on the relative location of the supplier with reference to the place of actual supply.
\nTherefore, the conclusion is that Section 7 of the IGST Act is not a stand-alone provision to determine the intra-state or inter-state nature of a supply.
\nYou need to determine in addition the location of the supplier to arrive at the correct type of tax to be paid i.e whether CGST\/SGST or IGST under Section 9 or 5 of respectively the CGST\/IGST Acts based on the relative locations of the supplier and recipient with reference to Section 7 ibid
\nThe above situation also fits into the definition of Import of services under Section 2(11) of IGST Act, 2017 since the said service provider is located outside India, service r<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nThe other conditions of Supplier and recipient having to be respectively located outside India and in India to qualify as Import in the above case is however squarely met in terms of the said Section 2(11) of the IGST Act.
\nThus charging of IGST and registration by a designated person on behalf of the owner of Immovable property located abroad and remitting the tax himself through his designated representative appear to be a good and compliant solution in this case.
\nWhen both supplier and recipient of renting of immovable property service are located outside India and property is situated in India, in the absence of a special procedure as provided under Section14 of the IGST Act as in the case of OIDAR service, there appears to be no other alternative available under the present Law.
\nThe Government will be well within its jurisdiction in my view to use the unfettered powers of Section 7(4) of the IGST Act in the above case a<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n Dated: 30-11-2017
\n Reply By CASanjay Kumawat as =
\nDear Sir,
\nThanks to cover this issue.
\nIn your article, you have discussed the deeming fiction, for the sake of ease relevant para is reproduced:
\n"The only way to enable the levy in this case is through creating a deeming fiction under the IGST Act, with reference to the person responsible for payment of tax as it needs to be deemed as an Import to be able to levy and collect IGST."
\nBut In the landmark decision of Govind Saran Ganga Saran v. Commissioner of Sales Tax 1985 (4) TMI 65 – SUPREME COURT, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that one of the canons of taxation is that there must be a clear indication of the person on whom the levy is imposed and who is obliged to pay the tax. If this component is not fulfilled, the Apex Court stated that “it is difficult to say that the levy exists in point of law”.
\nTherefore, in view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court ruling, <\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nYour views please.
\nDear Sanjay Kumwat,
\nIn the erstwhile FA,1994 Section 66 C provided for determination of place of provision of supply notwithstanding the fact that both service provider and recipient were outside the taxable territory.
\nSimilarly, Article 269A(5) provides for formulation of place of supply provisions under the GST regime.
\nSince the situation on hand needs to be likened to a transaction of Import\/inter-state supply, a deeming fiction under the IGST Act can be made to the effect that the place of supply is the location of the property and the supplier abroad can be designated as the person liable to tax rightfully under the IGST Act supported by the CAA,2016.
\nThis is my humble opinion without prejudice to the Hon'ble SC decision quoted above.
\nRegards
\nAuthor
\n Dated: 5-12-2017<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n