Hughes And Hughes Chem. Ltd. Versus Union of India And ANR
GST
2017 (11) TMI 1413 – DELHI HIGH COURT – 2017 (6) G. S. T. L. 369 (Del.)
DELHI HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 25-10-2017
W.P.(C) 8281\/2017
GST
MR. SANJIV KHANNA AND MR. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, JJ.
\nFor The Petitioner : Mr. Amit Khemka, Mr. Rishi Sehgal & Ms. Aditi Kharpate, Advocates
\nFor The Respondents : Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC And Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel
\nORDER
\nCM No. 38021\/2017
\nThis is an application for recall of the direction in order dated 9th October, 2017 whereby the Secretary of the GST Council was asked to remain present in the Court on 6th November, 2017.
\n2. Counsel for the petitioner-non applicant states that the petitioner has received<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n nd issue before the authorities concerned. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Hughes And Hughes Chem. Ltd. Versus Union of India And ANRGST2017 (11) TMI 1413 – DELHI HIGH COURT – 2017 (6) G. S. T. L. 369 (Del.)DELHI HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 25-10-2017W.P.(C) 8281\/2017 GSTMR. SANJIV KHANNA AND MR. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr. Amit Khemka, Mr. Rishi Sehgal & Ms. Aditi … Continue reading “Hughes And Hughes Chem. Ltd. Versus Union of India And ANR”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9174"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9174\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n6. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is unaware of the code number, which is applicable to a person\/service provider who seeks benefit of exemption under Serial No. 3 of the Notification No. 12\/2017- Central Tax (Rate). This is an aspect for which the petitioner must first get in touch with a specialist on the subject and in case they are unable to get hold of the code, correspond with the respondent Council, who, we are sure would ensure that the requisite information is made available.
\n7. In view of the aforesaid position, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition may be treated as disposed of. We take the said statement on record and dispose of the wr<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n