{"id":837,"date":"2016-01-22T10:19:14","date_gmt":"2016-01-22T04:49:14","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2016-01-22T10:19:14","modified_gmt":"2016-01-22T04:49:14","slug":"income-tax-case-firm-allowed-to-carry-forward-losses-despite-changes-in-partnership-39-s-profit-sharing-ratio-sections-187-78","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=837","title":{"rendered":"Income Tax Case: Firm Allowed to Carry Forward Losses Despite Changes in Partnership&#39;s Profit-Sharing Ratio (Sections 187 &#038; 78."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Income Tax Case: Firm Allowed to Carry Forward Losses Despite Changes in Partnership&#39;s Profit-Sharing Ratio (Sections 187 &#038; 78.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>Income Tax<br \/>Brought forward losses of firm &#8211; covered u\/s 187 OR u\/s. 78 &#8211; change in the terms and conditions of the partnership &#8211; the reconstitution of the partnership was made only as a result of changes in the profit sharing ratio amongst the partners &#8211; CIT(A) has rightly allowed carry forward losses to be set off, as claimed by the assessee &#8211; AT<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=27010\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Income Tax Case: Firm Allowed to Carry Forward Losses Despite Changes in Partnership&#39;s Profit-Sharing Ratio (Sections 187 &#038; 78.Case-LawsIncome TaxBrought forward losses of firm &#8211; covered u\/s 187 OR u\/s. 78 &#8211; change in the terms and conditions of the partnership &#8211; the reconstitution of the partnership was made only as a result of changes &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=837\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Income Tax Case: Firm Allowed to Carry Forward Losses Despite Changes in Partnership&#39;s Profit-Sharing Ratio (Sections 187 &#038; 78.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-837","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/837","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=837"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/837\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=837"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=837"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=837"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}