{"id":77099,"date":"2026-10-24T11:06:23","date_gmt":"2026-10-24T11:06:23","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2026-10-24T11:06:23","modified_gmt":"2026-10-24T11:06:23","slug":"contractual-arbitration-scope-excludes-gst-reimbursement-claims-requiring-writ-petitions-to-receive-merits-consideration-despite-an-arbitration-agreement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=77099","title":{"rendered":"Contractual arbitration scope excludes GST reimbursement claims, requiring writ petitions to receive merits consideration despite an arbitration agreement."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Contractual arbitration scope excludes GST reimbursement claims, requiring writ petitions to receive merits consideration despite an arbitration agreement.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>Contractual GST reimbursement claims under Clause 2.14.A were treated as outside the scope of the arbitration clause. Availability of an arbitration agreement therefore did not justify refusing to entertain a writ petition seeking refund of the GST element. Competing interpretations of the contractual tax-reimbursement clause, together with all questions of law and fact concerning entitlement, remained open for merits determination. The High Court&#39;s dismissal orders were set aside, and the writ and review petitions were restored for adjudication in accordance with law.<br \/> TMI Updates &#8211; Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=105385\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Contractual arbitration scope excludes GST reimbursement claims, requiring writ petitions to receive merits consideration despite an arbitration agreement.Case-LawsGSTContractual GST reimbursement claims under Clause 2.14.A were treated as outside the &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=77099"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77099\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=77099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=77099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=77099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}