{"id":77041,"date":"2026-10-19T07:01:13","date_gmt":"2026-10-19T07:01:13","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2026-10-19T07:01:13","modified_gmt":"2026-10-19T07:01:13","slug":"input-tax-credit-claims-require-transaction-specific-proof-of-goods-receipt-restored-supplier-registration-supports-entitlement-despite-bogus-supplier-allegations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=77041","title":{"rendered":"Input tax credit claims require transaction-specific proof of goods receipt; restored supplier registration supports entitlement despite bogus-supplier allegations."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Input tax credit claims require transaction-specific proof of goods receipt; restored supplier registration supports entitlement despite bogus-supplier allegations.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>Input tax credit on purchases from an allegedly bogus supplier was allowed where the recipient produced purchase, transportation and goods-receipt records. Entitlement required examination of statutory conditions and transaction-specific evidence, rather than reliance solely on allegations against the supplier. Restoration of the supplier&#39;s registration also undermined the claim that it was bogus or non-existent. Documents submitted as additional evidence did not prejudice the adjudicating authority because they were forwarded for examination and its report was considered. The procedural objection was rejected, and the Revenue&#39;s appeal against allowance of input tax credit was dismissed.<br \/> TMI Updates &#8211; Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=105166\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Input tax credit claims require transaction-specific proof of goods receipt; restored supplier registration supports entitlement despite bogus-supplier allegations.Case-LawsGSTInput tax credit on purchases from an allegedly bogus supplier was allowed w&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77041","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77041","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=77041"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77041\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=77041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=77041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=77041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}