Successive bail on parity fails without substantial change in circumstances, especially in alleged economic offences involving GST evasion.
Case-Laws
GST
Successive bail applications require a substantial change in facts or circumstances directly affecting the merits; parity with a co-accused alone does not justify release because the court must assess the accused's individual role, the gravity of the allegations and the investigation material. Economic offences are treated as a distinct class for bail and attract a stricter approach because they may involve deliberate conspiracies and broader financial harm. On the stated facts, the accused was prima facie linked to fictitious firms, fake invoices, e-way bills and alleged GST evasion through documentary, electronic and recorded statement material, so later bail to a co-accused did not amount to a sufficient change in circumstances.
TMI Updates – Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts <\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n