{"id":75417,"date":"2026-04-10T09:52:33","date_gmt":"2026-04-10T09:52:33","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2026-04-10T09:52:33","modified_gmt":"2026-04-10T09:52:33","slug":"gst-on-seigniorage-fee-and-royalty-stayed-pending-supreme-court-ruling-high-court-applies-earlier-identical-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=75417","title":{"rendered":"GST on seigniorage fee and royalty stayed pending Supreme Court ruling; High Court applies earlier identical order."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>GST on seigniorage fee and royalty stayed pending Supreme Court ruling; High Court applies earlier identical order.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>GST proceedings on seigniorage fee\/royalty for quarrying and transporting minerals were not finally adjudicated on merits because the levy issue is pending before the Supreme Court. The High Court found the facts to be almost identical to an earlier case and disposed of the writ petitions on the same terms, directing that the impugned proceedings remain in abeyance and that the respondent proceed in accordance with law after the Supreme Court decision. The Court therefore declined to examine the substantive GST demand at this stage and applied the earlier identical order.<br \/> TMI Updates &#8211; Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, alerts <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=98672\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>GST on seigniorage fee and royalty stayed pending Supreme Court ruling; High Court applies earlier identical order.Case-LawsGSTGST proceedings on seigniorage fee\/royalty for quarrying and transporting minerals were not finally adjudicated on merits bec&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=75417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75417\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=75417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=75417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=75417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}