{"id":71301,"date":"2025-04-09T07:42:31","date_gmt":"2025-04-09T02:12:31","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2025-04-09T07:42:31","modified_gmt":"2025-04-09T02:12:31","slug":"tax-refund-victory-petitioner-wins-challenge-against-rejected-budgetary-support-claims-under-notification-05-10-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=71301","title":{"rendered":"Tax Refund Victory: Petitioner Wins Challenge Against Rejected Budgetary Support Claims Under Notification 05.10.2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tax Refund Victory: Petitioner Wins Challenge Against Rejected Budgetary Support Claims Under Notification 05.10.2017<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>HC ruled in favor of petitioner, finding the rejection of budgetary support refund claims invalid. The court held that the calculation of 58% central tax and 29% IGST paid through cash ledger was correctly applied. The respondent&#39;s rejection of Rs. 31,456\/- for July-September 2021 and Rs. 69,684\/- for January-March 2022 quarters was deemed contrary to the n<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=87293\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tax Refund Victory: Petitioner Wins Challenge Against Rejected Budgetary Support Claims Under Notification 05.10.2017Case-LawsGSTHC ruled in favor of petitioner, finding the rejection of budgetary support refund claims invalid. The court held that the cal<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-71301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=71301"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71301\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=71301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=71301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=71301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}