{"id":69773,"date":"2024-08-08T09:11:18","date_gmt":"2024-08-08T03:41:18","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-08-08T09:11:18","modified_gmt":"2024-08-08T03:41:18","slug":"refund-denied-for-late-itc-claim-court-says-strict-time-limit-not-a-must-no-flaws-in-orders-petition-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69773","title":{"rendered":"Refund denied for late ITC claim. Court says strict time limit not a must. No flaws in orders. Petition rejected."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Refund denied for late ITC claim. Court says strict time limit not a must. No flaws in orders. Petition rejected.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>Rejection of refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to delay of 2 days beyond the 60-day statutory limit u\/s 54(7) of the Act. Court held that the term &#8220;shall&#8221; in the section is directory, not mandatory, considering the availability of interest on delayed refunds u\/s 56. Rigid adherence to the time limit would not serve the legislative intent. The impu<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=80262\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Refund denied for late ITC claim. Court says strict time limit not a must. No flaws in orders. Petition rejected.Case-LawsGSTRejection of refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to delay of 2 days beyond the 60-day statutory limit u\/s 54(7) of the Act. Court held that the term &#8220;shall&#8221; in the section is directory, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69773\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Refund denied for late ITC claim. Court says strict time limit not a must. No flaws in orders. Petition rejected.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}