{"id":69673,"date":"2024-07-25T08:06:00","date_gmt":"2024-07-25T02:36:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-07-25T08:06:00","modified_gmt":"2024-07-25T02:36:00","slug":"circular-no-9-upheld-no-need-for-notification-to-authorize-adjudication-power-under-sec-2-91-assessing-authority-39-s-dual-role-valid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69673","title":{"rendered":"Circular No.9 upheld; no need for notification to authorize adjudication power under Sec 2(91). Assessing authority&#39;s dual role valid."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Circular No.9 upheld; no need for notification to authorize adjudication power under Sec 2(91). Assessing authority&#39;s dual role valid.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>Circular No.9 dated 24.05.2019 challenged &#8211; authority to delegate power of adjudication by circular contrary to Section 167 requiring notification &#8211; assessing authority being inspecting authority leading to conflict of interest. Court held circular traceable to Section 2(91), not Section 167, hence notification unnecessary for authorizing a<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=79713\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Circular No.9 upheld; no need for notification to authorize adjudication power under Sec 2(91). Assessing authority&#39;s dual role valid.Case-LawsGSTCircular No.9 dated 24.05.2019 challenged &#8211; authority to delegate power of adjudication by circular contrary to Section 167 requiring notification &#8211; assessing authority being inspecting authority leading to conflict of interest. Court held circular traceable to Section &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69673\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Circular No.9 upheld; no need for notification to authorize adjudication power under Sec 2(91). Assessing authority&#39;s dual role valid.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69673"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69673\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}