{"id":69610,"date":"2024-07-17T08:07:09","date_gmt":"2024-07-17T02:37:09","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-07-17T08:07:09","modified_gmt":"2024-07-17T02:37:09","slug":"appellate-authority-39-s-inconsistent-approach-in-accepting-rejecting-contentions-sans-evidence-rejected-order-quashed-remanded-for-judicial-consideration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69610","title":{"rendered":"Appellate authority&#39;s inconsistent approach in accepting\/rejecting contentions sans evidence rejected. Order quashed, remanded for judicial consideration."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Appellate authority&#39;s inconsistent approach in accepting\/rejecting contentions sans evidence rejected. Order quashed, remanded for judicial consideration.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence regarding petitioner&#39;s intention to evade tax. Inconsistent approach rejecting petitioner&#39;s contention for lack of evidence while accepting department&#39;s contention despite absence of evidence. Appellate Authority must act judicially, adopting same approach towa<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=79478\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Appellate authority&#39;s inconsistent approach in accepting\/rejecting contentions sans evidence rejected. Order quashed, remanded for judicial consideration.Case-LawsGSTAppellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence regarding petitioner&#39;s intention to evade tax. Inconsistent approach rejecting petitioner&#39;s contention for lack of evidence while accepting department&#39;s contention despite absence of evidence. Appellate Authority must act judicially, adopting same approach towa = &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69610\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Appellate authority&#39;s inconsistent approach in accepting\/rejecting contentions sans evidence rejected. Order quashed, remanded for judicial consideration.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69610"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69610\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}