{"id":69607,"date":"2024-07-16T08:38:28","date_gmt":"2024-07-16T03:08:28","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-07-16T08:38:28","modified_gmt":"2024-07-16T03:08:28","slug":"gst-on-mineral-mining-royalty-in-limbo-petitioner-to-reply-in-4-weeks-respondent-to-keep-order-on-hold-pending-sc-verdict-as-per-division-bench","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69607","title":{"rendered":"GST on mineral mining royalty in limbo. Petitioner to reply in 4 weeks. Respondent to keep order on hold pending SC verdict as per Division Bench."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>GST on mineral mining royalty in limbo. Petitioner to reply in 4 weeks. Respondent to keep order on hold pending SC verdict as per Division Bench.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>GST levy on royalty payable for mining minerals &#8211; Reliance placed on Division Bench decision holding no GST recovery on royalty until Constitution Bench decision. Petitioner directed to file reply within 4 weeks, respondent to adjudicate but keep order implementation in abeyance pending Supreme Court orders as per Division Bench<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=79449\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>GST on mineral mining royalty in limbo. Petitioner to reply in 4 weeks. Respondent to keep order on hold pending SC verdict as per Division Bench.Case-LawsGSTGST levy on royalty payable for mining minerals &#8211; Reliance placed on Division Bench decision holding no GST recovery on royalty until Constitution Bench decision. Petitioner directed to file reply &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69607\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;GST on mineral mining royalty in limbo. Petitioner to reply in 4 weeks. Respondent to keep order on hold pending SC verdict as per Division Bench.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69607"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69607\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}