{"id":69582,"date":"2024-07-12T17:07:06","date_gmt":"2024-07-12T11:37:06","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-07-12T17:07:06","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T11:37:06","slug":"provisional-attachment-order-challenged-for-exceeding-1-year-limit-court-upheld-mandatory-time-limit-quashing-order-dated-19-05-2023","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69582","title":{"rendered":"Provisional attachment order challenged for exceeding 1-year limit. Court upheld mandatory time limit, quashing order dated 19.05.2023."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Provisional attachment order challenged for exceeding 1-year limit. Court upheld mandatory time limit, quashing order dated 19.05.2023.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>Provisional attachment order u\/s 83 of CGST Act challenged for completion of one year&#39;s period. Court held that Section 83 employs mandatory language, and impugned provisional attachment order dated 19.05.2023 ceased to have effect upon expiry of one year period from issuance date, i.e., 19.05.2023. Petition disposed of.<br \/> TMI Updates &#8211; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=79355\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Provisional attachment order challenged for exceeding 1-year limit. Court upheld mandatory time limit, quashing order dated 19.05.2023.Case-LawsGSTProvisional attachment order u\/s 83 of CGST Act challenged for completion of one year&#39;s period. Court held that Section 83 employs mandatory language, and impugned provisional attachment order dated 19.05.2023 ceased to have effect upon expiry of one year &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69582\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Provisional attachment order challenged for exceeding 1-year limit. Court upheld mandatory time limit, quashing order dated 19.05.2023.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69582"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69582\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}