{"id":69546,"date":"2024-07-05T08:21:20","date_gmt":"2024-07-05T02:51:20","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-07-05T08:21:20","modified_gmt":"2024-07-05T02:51:20","slug":"petitioner-denied-natural-justice-no-notice-u-s-73-failed-to-submit-explanation-despite-adjournments-presumed-delaying-tactic-statutory-remedy-available","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69546","title":{"rendered":"Petitioner denied natural justice; no notice u\/s 73; failed to submit explanation despite adjournments; presumed delaying tactic; statutory remedy available."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Petitioner denied natural justice; no notice u\/s 73; failed to submit explanation despite adjournments; presumed delaying tactic; statutory remedy available.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the impugned order was passed without following procedures u\/s 169(1)(a) and 169(1)(b) of the GST Act. Petitioner was not served notice u\/s 73. Despite granting adjournments, petitioner failed to submit explanation online or in person. Presumption was made that pe<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=79145\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Petitioner denied natural justice; no notice u\/s 73; failed to submit explanation despite adjournments; presumed delaying tactic; statutory remedy available.Case-LawsGSTViolation of principles of natural justice occurred as the impugned order was passed without following procedures u\/s 169(1)(a) and 169(1)(b) of the GST Act. Petitioner was not served notice u\/s 73. Despite granting adjournments, petitioner failed &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69546\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Petitioner denied natural justice; no notice u\/s 73; failed to submit explanation despite adjournments; presumed delaying tactic; statutory remedy available.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69546"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69546\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}