{"id":69510,"date":"2024-07-01T08:32:55","date_gmt":"2024-07-01T03:02:55","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-07-01T08:32:55","modified_gmt":"2024-07-01T03:02:55","slug":"high-court-ruled-no-intent-to-evade-tax-in-e-way-bill-case-rs-25-000-penalty-imposed-petitioner-wins-refund","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69510","title":{"rendered":"High Court ruled no intent to evade tax in e-way bill case. Rs. 25,000 penalty imposed. Petitioner wins refund."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>High Court ruled no intent to evade tax in e-way bill case. Rs. 25,000 penalty imposed. Petitioner wins refund.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>The High Court reviewed the validity of the show cause notice (SCN) and assessment order u\/s 129 of the CGST Act. The issue centered on penalty imposition due to non-updation of the e-way bill resulting from goods transfer to another vehicle. The court found no evidence of intent to contravene the Act or evade tax. Consequently, a general penalty of Rs. 25,000 wa<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=78992\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High Court ruled no intent to evade tax in e-way bill case. Rs. 25,000 penalty imposed. Petitioner wins refund.Case-LawsGSTThe High Court reviewed the validity of the show cause notice (SCN) and assessment order u\/s 129 of the CGST Act. The issue centered on penalty imposition due to non-updation of the e-way bill resulting from goods &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69510\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;High Court ruled no intent to evade tax in e-way bill case. Rs. 25,000 penalty imposed. Petitioner wins refund.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69510","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69510","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69510"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69510\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69510"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69510"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69510"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}