{"id":69469,"date":"2024-06-24T11:57:36","date_gmt":"2024-06-24T06:27:36","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-06-24T11:57:36","modified_gmt":"2024-06-24T06:27:36","slug":"high-court-ruled-audit-notice-under-central-gst-act-valid-if-not-same-subject-as-state-gst-proceedings-no-restriction-in-statute-petition-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69469","title":{"rendered":"High Court ruled audit notice under Central GST Act valid if not same subject as State GST proceedings. No restriction in statute. Petition dismissed."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>High Court ruled audit notice under Central GST Act valid if not same subject as State GST proceedings. No restriction in statute. Petition dismissed.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>The High Court considered the validity of a notice issued u\/s 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 regarding GST Audit. The writ petition challenged the Central GST authorities&#39; power to initiate proceedings when the subject matter was already under consideration by State GST authorities. The Court held that th<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=78784\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High Court ruled audit notice under Central GST Act valid if not same subject as State GST proceedings. No restriction in statute. Petition dismissed.Case-LawsGSTThe High Court considered the validity of a notice issued u\/s 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 regarding GST Audit. The writ petition challenged the Central GST authorities&#39; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69469\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;High Court ruled audit notice under Central GST Act valid if not same subject as State GST proceedings. No restriction in statute. Petition dismissed.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69469","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69469"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69469\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}