{"id":69452,"date":"2024-06-20T15:50:15","date_gmt":"2024-06-20T10:20:15","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-06-20T15:50:15","modified_gmt":"2024-06-20T10:20:15","slug":"court-quashes-assessment-order-due-to-disparity-in-gst-returns-petitioner-agrees-to-pay-10-of-disputed-tax-demand-for-remand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69452","title":{"rendered":"Court quashes assessment order due to disparity in GST returns. Petitioner agrees to pay 10% of disputed tax demand for remand."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Court quashes assessment order due to disparity in GST returns. Petitioner agrees to pay 10% of disputed tax demand for remand.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>The High Court considered a challenge to an assessment order based on disparity between the petitioner&#39;s GSTR 3B return and the supplier&#39;s GSTR 1 return. The petitioner&#39;s explanation for the disparity was noted, attributing it to the supplier&#39;s error in reporting turnover. The court found the petitioner negligent for not uploading the reply and no<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=78681\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Court quashes assessment order due to disparity in GST returns. Petitioner agrees to pay 10% of disputed tax demand for remand.Case-LawsGSTThe High Court considered a challenge to an assessment order based on disparity between the petitioner&#39;s GSTR 3B return and the supplier&#39;s GSTR 1 return. The petitioner&#39;s explanation for the disparity was noted, attributing it &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69452\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Court quashes assessment order due to disparity in GST returns. Petitioner agrees to pay 10% of disputed tax demand for remand.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69452"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69452\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}