{"id":69449,"date":"2024-06-19T17:39:27","date_gmt":"2024-06-19T12:09:27","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-06-19T17:39:27","modified_gmt":"2024-06-19T12:09:27","slug":"denial-of-gst-refund-due-to-improper-application-filing-court-cites-relevant-rules-for-manual-applications-petitioner-39-s-case-remanded-for-fresh-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69449","title":{"rendered":"Denial of GST refund due to improper application filing. Court cites relevant rules for manual applications. Petitioner&#39;s case remanded for fresh review."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Denial of GST refund due to improper application filing. Court cites relevant rules for manual applications. Petitioner&#39;s case remanded for fresh review.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>The High Court declined to consider refund applications u\/s 54 (3) of GST for FY 2017-2018, 2018-2019 &#038; 2020-2021 due to non-filing of RFD-01 forms as petitioner was unregistered. Citing precedent from Bombay and Gujarat High Courts, assessing authority must consider Rule 97A allowing manual applications. Petitioner, thou<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=78650\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Denial of GST refund due to improper application filing. Court cites relevant rules for manual applications. Petitioner&#39;s case remanded for fresh review.Case-LawsGSTThe High Court declined to consider refund applications u\/s 54 (3) of GST for FY 2017-2018, 2018-2019 &#038; 2020-2021 due to non-filing of RFD-01 forms as petitioner was unregistered. Citing precedent from Bombay and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69449\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Denial of GST refund due to improper application filing. Court cites relevant rules for manual applications. Petitioner&#39;s case remanded for fresh review.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69449"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69449\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}