{"id":69442,"date":"2024-06-18T11:43:21","date_gmt":"2024-06-18T06:13:21","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-06-18T11:43:21","modified_gmt":"2024-06-18T06:13:21","slug":"petitioner-39-s-refund-claim-rejected-due-to-discrepancies-in-filings-court-seeks-reasons-for-denial-case-sent-for-re-consideration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69442","title":{"rendered":"Petitioner&#39;s refund claim rejected due to discrepancies in filings. Court seeks reasons for denial. Case sent for re-consideration."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Petitioner&#39;s refund claim rejected due to discrepancies in filings. Court seeks reasons for denial. Case sent for re-consideration.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>The High Court dealt with a case involving the rejection of a refund claim due to discrepancies between the petitioner&#39;s GSTR 1 statement and GSTR 3B return. The Court found that no reasons were given for determining that the claim did not meet the requirements of u\/s 77. Additionally, the Court noted that although it was concluded that there <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=78604\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Petitioner&#39;s refund claim rejected due to discrepancies in filings. Court seeks reasons for denial. Case sent for re-consideration.Case-LawsGSTThe High Court dealt with a case involving the rejection of a refund claim due to discrepancies between the petitioner&#39;s GSTR 1 statement and GSTR 3B return. The Court found that no reasons were given for determining that &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69442\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Petitioner&#39;s refund claim rejected due to discrepancies in filings. Court seeks reasons for denial. Case sent for re-consideration.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69442\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}