{"id":69418,"date":"2024-06-12T12:47:52","date_gmt":"2024-06-12T07:17:52","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2024-06-12T12:47:52","modified_gmt":"2024-06-12T07:17:52","slug":"petitioner-39-s-challenge-to-gst-assessment-rejected-due-to-missing-documents-order-quashed-for-re-consideration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69418","title":{"rendered":"Petitioner&#39;s challenge to GST assessment rejected due to missing documents. Order quashed for re-consideration."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Petitioner&#39;s challenge to GST assessment rejected due to missing documents. Order quashed for re-consideration.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>The High Court addressed a challenge to an assessment order u\/s GST ASMT-10 due to non-submission of required documents. The assessing officer rejected the petitioner&#39;s reply citing lack of reconciliation statements and incomplete submission of relevant invoices. The Court found the rejection unsustainable as the petitioner&#39;s reply in Form ASMT-10 was sufficient.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=78425\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Petitioner&#39;s challenge to GST assessment rejected due to missing documents. Order quashed for re-consideration.Case-LawsGSTThe High Court addressed a challenge to an assessment order u\/s GST ASMT-10 due to non-submission of required documents. The assessing officer rejected the petitioner&#39;s reply citing lack of reconciliation statements and incomplete submission of relevant invoices. The Court found the rejection &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=69418\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Petitioner&#39;s challenge to GST assessment rejected due to missing documents. Order quashed for re-consideration.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=69418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69418\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=69418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=69418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=69418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}