{"id":67851,"date":"2015-07-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-07-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2015-07-20T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2015-07-19T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-chitamber-agencies-versus-commercial-tax-officer-circle-i-floor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=67851","title":{"rendered":"M\/s. Chitamber Agencies Versus Commercial Tax Officer, Circle I, Floor,"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. Chitamber Agencies Versus Commercial Tax Officer, Circle I, Floor,<br \/>VAT \/  Sales Tax<br \/>2015 (7) TMI 1414 &#8211; TELEGANA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>TELEGANA HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 20-7-2015<br \/>WRIT PETITION Nos. 20787 and 20796 of 2015 <br \/>CST, VAT &#038; Sales Tax<br \/>THE HON&#39;BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON&#39;BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM<br \/>\nFOR THE PETITIONER :S R R VISWANATH<br \/>\nCOMMON ORDER:<br \/>\nPer Hon&#39;ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram<br \/>\nThese writ petitions are filed questioning the assessment orders, dated 27-03-2015 passed by the 1st respondent in A.A.O.No.15746\/R.C.No.22\/2011 and A.A.O.No.15751\/R.C.No.22\/2011 respectively.<br \/>\nIt is the specific submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that though the assessment was m<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=304624\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p>ly submits that the record does not disclose the material particulars sought by the petitioner have not been furnished to the petitioners. Learned Government Pleader submits that the assessment orders may be set aside by giving liberty to the authorities to make re-assessment after furnishing the necessary details to the dealer. The stand taken by the learned Government Pleader is reasonable and we appreciate the frankness with which he made submissions.<br \/>\nIn the facts of the present case and in the circumstances the assessment order is set aside. However, considering the fact that we are setting aside the assessment orders, we deem it appropriate to direct the respondent authorities to furnish the details to the petitioners within a period <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=304624\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. Chitamber Agencies Versus Commercial Tax Officer, Circle I, Floor,VAT \/ Sales Tax2015 (7) TMI 1414 &#8211; TELEGANA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMITELEGANA HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 20-7-2015WRIT PETITION Nos. 20787 and 20796 of 2015 CST, VAT &#038; Sales TaxTHE HON&#39;BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON&#39;BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM FOR THE PETITIONER &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=67851\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s. Chitamber Agencies Versus Commercial Tax Officer, Circle I, Floor,&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=67851"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67851\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=67851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=67851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=67851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}