{"id":17223,"date":"2019-01-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-01-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2019-01-11T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2019-01-10T18:30:00","slug":"new-era-fabrics-pvt-ltd-versus-commissioner-of-cgst-mumbai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=17223","title":{"rendered":"New Era Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>New Era Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai<br \/>Service Tax<br \/>2019 (3) TMI 446 &#8211; CESTAT MUMBAI &#8211; TMI<br \/>CESTAT MUMBAI &#8211; AT<br \/>Dated:- 11-1-2019<br \/>Application No. ST\/ROM-86346\/2018, Appeal No. ST\/88122\/2017 &#8211; M\/85142\/2019<br \/>Service Tax<br \/>Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial)<br \/>\nShri Keval Shah, C.A. for appellant<br \/>\nShri Dilip Shinde, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nPer: S.K. Mohanty<br \/>\nHeard both sides.<br \/>\n2. The applicant has filed this miscellaneous application, seeking for rectification of mistake in the order No. A\/86957\/2018 dated 05.07.2018 passed by the Tribunal. The applicant has stated that against the impugned order dated 29.09.2017, both the assessee as well as Revenue have preferred appeals before Tribunal<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=376425\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>New Era Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, MumbaiService Tax2019 (3) TMI 446 &#8211; CESTAT MUMBAI &#8211; TMICESTAT MUMBAI &#8211; ATDated:- 11-1-2019Application No. ST\/ROM-86346\/2018, Appeal No. ST\/88122\/2017 &#8211; M\/85142\/2019Service TaxMr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial) Shri Keval Shah, C.A. for appellant Shri Dilip Shinde, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty Heard both &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=17223\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;New Era Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Mumbai&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17223\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}