Ikram Hameed Versus State of Punjab and others
GST
2019 (2) TMI 1450 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – TMI
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 20-2-2019
Civil Writ Petition No. 4263 of 2019
GST
MR AJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND MRS MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, JJ.
\nFor The Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate
\nORDER
\nAJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
\nThe prayer in this petition filed under Articles 226\/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.3 to release the vehicle of the petitioner bearing No. UP-11-AT-7039.
\n2. The services of the petitioner's vehicle for transporting the goods were availed by M\/s Durga Logistic and the goods were being supplied by M\/<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n nnexure P-3) and direction was issued to deposit the entire amount of tax and penalty for release of the same. Thereafter, the petitioner moved a representation to respondent No.3, being registered owner of the vehicle in question, for its release after unloading the goods but no response has been received till date. Hence, the present writ petition. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ikram Hameed Versus State of Punjab and othersGST2019 (2) TMI 1450 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – TMIPUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 20-2-2019Civil Writ Petition No. 4263 of 2019 GSTMR AJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND MRS MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate ORDER AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, … Continue reading “Ikram Hameed Versus State of Punjab and others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17005","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17005"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17005\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the relief claimed in the writ petition, the petitioner has moved a representation dated 25.01.2019 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.3, but no action has so far been taken thereon.
\n4. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, perusing the present petition and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we dispose of<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n