M\/s. Ravago Shah Polymers Pvt. Limited Versus The Union of India Represented By Its Secretary Minist
GST
2019 (2) TMI 461 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – TMI
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 24-1-2019
WRIT PETITION No. 527\/2019 (T-RES)
GST
MRS. S. SUJATHA J.
\nPETITIONERS (BY SRI R DAKSHINA MURTHY, ADV. FOR SRI RAVI SHANKAR K S, ADV.)
\nRESPONDENTS (BY SRI T K VEDAMURTHY, AGA. FOR R2-4)
\nORDER
\nThe petitioners have assailed the communication\/representation dated 27.06.2018 issued by respondent No.6 inter alia seeking a direction to respondent No.6 to act on the representation of the petitioner dated 6.03.2018 at Annexure G to the writ petition and sought for other consequential reliefs.
\n2. The petitioners claiming to b<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n mendations of the counsel, can extend the date for submitting the Form in GST Tran-1 by a further period not beyond March 2019 in respect of registered persons, who could not submit the said declaration on the common portal and the notification issued by the Commissioner dated 17th September 2018 extending the period for submitting the Form GST Tran-1 till 31.01.2019 for the class of registered persons, who could not submit the Form \/ declaration by the due date on account of the technical defect on the common portal, the writ petition does not survive for consideration and is rendered infructuous. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s. Ravago Shah Polymers Pvt. Limited Versus The Union of India Represented By Its Secretary MinistGST2019 (2) TMI 461 – KARNATAKA HIGH COURT – TMIKARNATAKA HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 24-1-2019WRIT PETITION No. 527\/2019 (T-RES) GSTMRS. S. SUJATHA J. PETITIONERS (BY SRI R DAKSHINA MURTHY, ADV. FOR SRI RAVI SHANKAR K S, ADV.) RESPONDENTS (BY … Continue reading “M\/s. Ravago Shah Polymers Pvt. Limited Versus The Union of India Represented By Its Secretary Minist”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16670"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16670\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n4. The petitioners are at liberty to avail the benefit of the notification issued by the Commissioner dated 17th September 2018.
\n5. Hence the <\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n