{"id":16629,"date":"2019-02-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-02-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2019-02-05T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2019-02-04T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-s-a-products-lucknow-thru-prop-sandeep-arora-versus-state-of-u-p-thru-prin-secy-deptt-of-commercial-tax-and-ors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=16629","title":{"rendered":"M\/s S.A. Products, Lucknow Thru. Prop. Sandeep Arora Versus State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Commercial Tax And Ors."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s S.A. Products, Lucknow Thru. Prop. Sandeep Arora Versus State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Commercial Tax And Ors.<br \/>GST<br \/>2019 (2) TMI 330 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 5-2-2019<br \/>Misc. Bench No. &#8211; 3349 of 2019 <br \/>GST<br \/>Shabihul Hasnain And Alok Mathur JJ.<br \/>\nFor the Petitioner : Mohammad Babar Khan,Anoop Kumar Vajpayee<br \/>\nFor the Respondent : C.S.C.<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nHeard Sri Mohammad Babar Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel.<br \/>\nPetitioner has submitted that he had already paid the tax at the time of sale of goods specifically mentioned in the sales invoice e-way bill duly generated, hence, the petitioner has not contravened the provisions of CGST and SGST <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=374703\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s S.A. Products, Lucknow Thru. Prop. Sandeep Arora Versus State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Commercial Tax And Ors.GST2019 (2) TMI 330 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; TMIALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 5-2-2019Misc. Bench No. &#8211; 3349 of 2019 GSTShabihul Hasnain And Alok Mathur JJ. For the Petitioner : Mohammad Babar Khan,Anoop Kumar &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=16629\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s S.A. Products, Lucknow Thru. Prop. Sandeep Arora Versus State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Commercial Tax And Ors.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}