M\/s Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco Private Ltd. Versus State of Up And 3 Others
GST
2018 (4) TMI 1630 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 590 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 5-4-2018
WRIT TAX No. – 592 of 2018
GST
Mr Ashok Kumar And Krishna Murari, JJ.
\nFor The Petitioner : Shubham Agrawal
\nFor The Respondent : C. S. C. , A. S. G. I.
\nORDER
\nHeard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1,3 and 4 and Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.
\nBy means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the jurisdiction of the respondent nos. 1,3 and 4 as well as the the seizure of the co<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n aged, till the time of the downloading of the E-Way Bill, the details with regard to the vehicle are not mentioned and the same are being mentioned subsequently after downloading the E-Way Bill in handwriting. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco Private Ltd. Versus State of Up And 3 OthersGST2018 (4) TMI 1630 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 590 (All.)ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 5-4-2018WRIT TAX No. – 592 of 2018 GSTMr Ashok Kumar And Krishna Murari, JJ. For The Petitioner : Shubham Agrawal For The … Continue reading “M\/s Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco Private Ltd. Versus State of Up And 3 Others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15893\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nSeizing authority doubted the transaction on the basis of the hand written details of the vehicle number and has seized the goods as well as vehicle.
\nHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the opposite parties. With the consent of the parties the instant writ petition is decided finally without calling the counter affidavit.
\nWe find no irregularity in the transaction in question, for the reason, that till the downloading of the E-Way Bill the transport company and the vehicle was not engaged and t<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n