{"id":15738,"date":"2018-12-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-12-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-12-21T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-12-20T18:30:00","slug":"nirman-estate-developers-private-limited-versus-union-of-india-and-ors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=15738","title":{"rendered":"Nirman Estate Developers Private Limited Versus Union of India and ors."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nirman Estate Developers Private Limited Versus Union of India and ors.<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (12) TMI 1442 &#8211; BOMBAY HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>BOMBAY HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 21-12-2018<br \/>WRIT PETITION NO. 3357 OF 2018 <br \/>GST<br \/>AKIL KURESHI AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.<br \/>\nMr. Abhishek Rastogi with Mr. Ankit Shah with Ms. Rashmi Deshpande i\/by M\/s. Khaitan &#038; Co. for the Petitioner.<br \/>\nMr. V.A. Sonpal, Special counsel for Respondent No.3. &nbsp;<br \/>\nP.C.:<br \/>\n1. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges Notification No.4 of 2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 25th January, 2018 and Notification No.4 of 2018-State Tax (Rate) dated 25th January, 2018. The basic grievance of the Petitioner is that the notifications seek to bring the tax an acti<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=372673\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nirman Estate Developers Private Limited Versus Union of India and ors.GST2018 (12) TMI 1442 &#8211; BOMBAY HIGH COURT &#8211; TMIBOMBAY HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 21-12-2018WRIT PETITION NO. 3357 OF 2018 GSTAKIL KURESHI AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. Mr. Abhishek Rastogi with Mr. Ankit Shah with Ms. Rashmi Deshpande i\/by M\/s. Khaitan &#038; Co. for the Petitioner. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=15738\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Nirman Estate Developers Private Limited Versus Union of India and ors.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15738","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15738"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15738\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}