{"id":15474,"date":"2018-12-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-12-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-12-07T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-12-06T18:30:00","slug":"ashokkumar-satyanarayan-agarwal-versus-state-tax-officer-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=15474","title":{"rendered":"ASHOKKUMAR SATYANARAYAN AGARWAL Versus STATE TAX OFFICER (1)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>ASHOKKUMAR SATYANARAYAN AGARWAL Versus STATE TAX OFFICER (1)<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (12) TMI 610 &#8211; GUJARAT HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>GUJARAT HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 7-12-2018<br \/>R\/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18998 of 2018 <br \/>GST<br \/>MS. HARSHA DEVANI AND DR. A. P. THAKER, JJ.<br \/>\nORAL ORDER<br \/>\n(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)<br \/>\n1. Mr. Vinay Shraff, learned advocate with Mr. Vishal Dave, learned advocate for the petitioner invited the attention of the court to Circular No.41\/15\/2018-GST dated 13.4.2018 issued by the Government of India and more particularly, to clause 2(l) thereof. It was submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the penalty in terms of the said clause and that the proceedings may go on and that the petitioner <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=371841\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ASHOKKUMAR SATYANARAYAN AGARWAL Versus STATE TAX OFFICER (1)GST2018 (12) TMI 610 &#8211; GUJARAT HIGH COURT &#8211; TMIGUJARAT HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 7-12-2018R\/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18998 of 2018 GSTMS. HARSHA DEVANI AND DR. A. P. THAKER, JJ. ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1. Mr. Vinay Shraff, learned advocate with Mr. Vishal Dave, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=15474\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;ASHOKKUMAR SATYANARAYAN AGARWAL Versus STATE TAX OFFICER (1)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15474"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15474\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}