{"id":15359,"date":"2018-11-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-11-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-11-26T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-11-25T18:30:00","slug":"sunaiba-industries-versus-state-of-u-p-and-2-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=15359","title":{"rendered":"Sunaiba Industries Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sunaiba Industries Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (12) TMI 295 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; 2019 (22) G. S. T. L. 180 (All.)<br \/>ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 26-11-2018<br \/>Writ Tax No. &#8211; 1480 of 2018 <br \/>GST<br \/>Pankaj Mithal And Pankaj Bhatia JJ.<br \/>\nFor the Petitioner : Shubham Agrawal<br \/>\nFor the Respondent : C.S.C.<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nHeard Sri Subham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner.<br \/>\nThe petitioner is the selling dealer of the goods. The goods were being transported from Delhi to Kanpur in 30 builties. Only on account of improper invoice in respect of some of the builites, the goods have been seized and directed to be released on furnishing security and indemnity bond as provided under Section 129 (1) (b) of the U.P. Good<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=371526\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sunaiba Industries Versus State Of U.P. And 2 OthersGST2018 (12) TMI 295 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; 2019 (22) G. S. T. L. 180 (All.)ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 26-11-2018Writ Tax No. &#8211; 1480 of 2018 GSTPankaj Mithal And Pankaj Bhatia JJ. For the Petitioner : Shubham Agrawal For the Respondent : C.S.C. ORDER Heard &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=15359\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Sunaiba Industries Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15359","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15359","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15359"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15359\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15359"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15359"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15359"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}