Loka Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others
GST
2018 (11) TMI 888 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 306 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 2-11-2018
Writ Tax No. – 1430 of 2018
GST
Pankaj Mithal And Ajit Kumar JJ.
\nFor the Petitioner : Shubham Agrawal
\nFor the Respondent : C.S.C.
\nORDER
\nHeard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents.
\nThe goods of the petitioner moving from Chhattisgarh to Hamirpur have been detained for the reason that the petitioner has tried to hide the correct identity of the consignee.
\nThe argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is a dealer at Aligarh and he had purchased the<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n s any contravention to the provisions of the Act or the Rules. The detention order fails to specify any provision of the Act or the Rules which has been violated. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Loka Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of U.P. And 2 OthersGST2018 (11) TMI 888 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 306 (All.)ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 2-11-2018Writ Tax No. – 1430 of 2018 GSTPankaj Mithal And Ajit Kumar JJ. For the Petitioner : Shubham Agrawal For the Respondent : C.S.C. … Continue reading “Loka Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15052\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nSri C.B. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents prays for and is granted three weeks' time to file counter affidavit. One week thereafter is allowed to the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit.
\nList thereafter for admission\/ final disposal.
\nIn the meantime, the detained goods and the vehicle shall be released forthwith, on the petitioner furnishing security other than cash and bank guarantee and the indemnity bond of the amount of the proposed tax and the penalty, as the petitioner is the owner of the goods, as per notice under Section 129(3) read with Sectio<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n