Kei Rsos Maritime Limited Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam GST
Service Tax
2018 (11) TMI 836 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD – AT
Dated:- 8-10-2018
ST\/ROM\/30591\/2017, ST\/447\/2007, ST\/448\/2007 – M\/30485\/2018
Service Tax
Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Mr. P.V. Subba Rao, Member (Technical)
\nNone for the Appellant.
\nShri Guna Ranjan, Superintendent\/AR for the Respondent.
\nORDER
\nPer: Mr. M.V. Ravindran
\n1. This application is filed by Revenue for rectification of mistake in the Final Order No. A\/30852-30853\/2017, dated 21.06.2017.
\n2. It is the case of Revenue that the appeal numbers mentioned in the final order should be “ST\/257\/2007 and ST\/258\/2007” instead of ST\/447 & 448\/2007.
\n3. We find that these t<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n transferred to Bangalore Bench. When these appeals were received at Bangalore Bench, they were re-numbered, as is the procedure. The re-numbered are “ST\/447, 448 of 2007”, which have been listed and disposed of. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Kei Rsos Maritime Limited Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam GSTService Tax2018 (11) TMI 836 – CESTAT HYDERABAD – TMICESTAT HYDERABAD – ATDated:- 8-10-2018ST\/ROM\/30591\/2017, ST\/447\/2007, ST\/448\/2007 – M\/30485\/2018Service TaxMr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Mr. P.V. Subba Rao, Member (Technical) None for the Appellant. Shri Guna Ranjan, Superintendent\/AR for the Respondent. ORDER Per: Mr. M.V. Ravindran 1. This … Continue reading “Kei Rsos Maritime Limited Versus CCT, Visakhapatnam GST”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15044","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15044"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15044\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n4. In view of the foregoing, we hold that there is no error in mentioning the appeal numbers in the final order dated 21.06.2017 of the Tribunal.
\n5. Yet, another error brought to the notice of the Bench is that in the Final Order No. A\/30852-30853\/2017, dated 21.06.2017 of the Tribunal, it did not mention the Order-in-Original No. 12\/2007(ST), dated 24.08.2007 passed by CCE, Trichy. We do find that this is a typographical error and accordingly, the above said Order-in-Original is to be included on the first page of the Final Order<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n