M\/s PANEL SOURCE LLP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUARD NO. V, STAGE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI
GST
2018 (11) TMI 398 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 19-9-2018
WP (C). No. 30729 of 2018
GST
MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
\nFor The Petitioner : BY ADVS. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) RAJAGOPAL M
\nFor The Respondent : N NAGARESH ASGI
\nJUDGMENT
\nThe petitioner, a dealer, faced detention proceedings u<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n issue of Ext.P7 order and Ext.P7(a) notice and after scrutinizing the same,t o strike down and quash them ; = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s PANEL SOURCE LLP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUARD NO. V, STAGE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTTAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, … Continue reading “M\/s PANEL SOURCE LLP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SQUAD NO V, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUARD NO. V, STAGE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, KASARAGOD, THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14873"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14873\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n iii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, orders or directions idrecting the respondent to refrain from proceedings further under section 129 of the Act based on Ext.P7 and Ext.P7(a) ;
\n iv) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, orders or directions, directing the respondent to release the goods to the petitioner without collecting any security under S.129(1)(c) ;
\n v) issue such other writ, order or direction which this Court deems fit and necessary in the interest of justice.
\nNevertheless, the issue raised in this writ petition stands squarely covered by judgment dated 9th August 2018 in WPC No.26986 <\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n