{"id":14786,"date":"2018-10-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-10-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-10-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-10-29T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-diamond-metal-versus-state-of-u-p-and-2-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=14786","title":{"rendered":"M\/s Diamond Metal Versus State of U.P. And 2 Others"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Diamond Metal Versus State of U.P. And 2 Others<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (11) TMI 56 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 305 (All.)<br \/>ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 30-10-2018<br \/>Writ Tax No. &#8211; 1406 of 2018 <br \/>GST<br \/>Pankaj Mithal And Ashok Kumar JJ.<br \/>\nFor the Petitioner : Aditya Pandey<br \/>\nFor the Respondent : C.S.C.<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nHeard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondents.<br \/>\nThe Aluminium scrap of the petitioner transported from Kanpur to Jaunpur has been intercepted and detained under Section 129(1) of the U.P. GST Act, only for the reason that the vehicle number do not tally with the vehicle number mentioned on the E-way bill. Petitioner is a registered dealer <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=369713\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Diamond Metal Versus State of U.P. And 2 OthersGST2018 (11) TMI 56 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; 2019 (21) G. S. T. L. 305 (All.)ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 30-10-2018Writ Tax No. &#8211; 1406 of 2018 GSTPankaj Mithal And Ashok Kumar JJ. For the Petitioner : Aditya Pandey For the Respondent : C.S.C. ORDER &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=14786\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s Diamond Metal Versus State of U.P. And 2 Others&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14786","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14786"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14786\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14786"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14786"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}