{"id":14574,"date":"2018-10-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-10-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-10-11T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-10-10T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-malabar-steel-industries-versus-the-asst-state-tax-officer-state-gst-department-karukutty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=14574","title":{"rendered":"M\/s. MALABAR STEEL INDUSTRIES Versus THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KARUKUTTY"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. MALABAR STEEL INDUSTRIES Versus THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KARUKUTTY<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (10) TMI 1137 &#8211; KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 11-10-2018<br \/>WP(C). No. 33178 of 2018 <br \/>GST<br \/>MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.<br \/>\nFor The Petitioner : SRI.SANTHOSH P.ABRAHAM AND SMT.S.K.DEVI<br \/>\nFor The Respondent : GP. DR. THUSHARA JAMES<br \/>\nJUDGMENT<br \/>\nThe petitioner, a dealer under the CSGST Act, sold goods as seen from Ext.P1 invoice. The vehicle and the goods were detained because the validity of the Ext.P2 e-way bill expired and the invoice number was allegedly manipulated. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed this writ petition.<br \/>\n2. In the writ petition, the petitioner sought the following reliefs:<br \/>\n &#8220;(i) To is<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=369171\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. MALABAR STEEL INDUSTRIES Versus THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KARUKUTTYGST2018 (10) TMI 1137 &#8211; KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMIKERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 11-10-2018WP(C). No. 33178 of 2018 GSTMR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J. For The Petitioner : SRI.SANTHOSH P.ABRAHAM AND SMT.S.K.DEVI For The Respondent : GP. DR. THUSHARA JAMES JUDGMENT The &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=14574\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s. MALABAR STEEL INDUSTRIES Versus THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KARUKUTTY&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14574"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14574\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}