{"id":14445,"date":"2018-10-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-10-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-10-10T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-10-09T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-hind-timber-merchant-versus-state-of-u-p-and-3-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=14445","title":{"rendered":"M\/s Hind Timber Merchant Versus State of U.P. And 3 Others"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Hind Timber Merchant Versus State of U.P. And 3 Others<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (10) TMI 680 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 427 (All.)<br \/>ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 10-10-2018<br \/>Writ &#8211; C No. &#8211; 34345 of 2018 <br \/>GST<br \/>Dilip B. Bhosale,Chief Justice And Yashwant Varma,J.<br \/>\nFor the Petitioner : Praveen Kumar<br \/>\nFor the Respondent : C.S.C.,Archit Mandhyan<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nHeard Mr. P. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A.K. Narayan, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3.<br \/>\nThis petition is against the order dated 1.8.2018 issued by respondent no.4-Deputy Commissioner (SIB), Commercial Tax (Sales Tax), wherein it is stated that the petitioners have not paid GST, as per the provisions of the Central Goods and Servic<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=368714\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Hind Timber Merchant Versus State of U.P. And 3 OthersGST2018 (10) TMI 680 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 427 (All.)ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 10-10-2018Writ &#8211; C No. &#8211; 34345 of 2018 GSTDilip B. Bhosale,Chief Justice And Yashwant Varma,J. For the Petitioner : Praveen Kumar For the Respondent &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=14445\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s Hind Timber Merchant Versus State of U.P. And 3 Others&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14445","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14445","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14445"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14445\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14445"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14445"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14445"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}