{"id":14261,"date":"2018-09-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-09-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-09-25T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-09-24T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-parvatiya-plywood-pvt-ltd-versus-cgst-cc-ce-dehradun","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=14261","title":{"rendered":"M\/s Parvatiya Plywood Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST, CC &#038; CE, Dehradun"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Parvatiya Plywood Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST, CC &#038; CE, Dehradun<br \/>Central Excise<br \/>2018 (10) TMI 211 &#8211; CESTAT NEW DELHI &#8211; TMI<br \/>CESTAT NEW DELHI &#8211; AT<br \/>Dated:- 25-9-2018<br \/>E\/COD\/50910\/2018 in Appeal No. E\/52536\/2018-DB &#8211; Misc. Order No. 50686\/2018<br \/>Central Excise<br \/>Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) And Mr. Bijay Kumar, Member (Technical)<br \/>\nFor the Appellant : None<br \/>\nFor the Respondent : Shri S.K. Bansal, D.R.<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nPER ANIL CHOUDHARY :<br \/>\nThe appellant has filed the present appeal for condonation of 23 days delay. The appellant is absent on call. Heard the ld. AR for Revenue and perused the record. In the condonation application, it is stated that the appellant had received the impugned order on 5th April, 2018 and accordingly the <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=368245\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Parvatiya Plywood Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST, CC &#038; CE, DehradunCentral Excise2018 (10) TMI 211 &#8211; CESTAT NEW DELHI &#8211; TMICESTAT NEW DELHI &#8211; ATDated:- 25-9-2018E\/COD\/50910\/2018 in Appeal No. E\/52536\/2018-DB &#8211; Misc. Order No. 50686\/2018Central ExciseMr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) And Mr. Bijay Kumar, Member (Technical) For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=14261\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s Parvatiya Plywood Pvt. Ltd. Versus CGST, CC &#038; CE, Dehradun&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14261"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14261\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}