M\/s. Sri Krishna Chemical Industries Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN), Goods and Service Tax Council, The Nodal Officer for State GST – Joint Commissioner of GST (CT-1), The Assistant Commissioner of GST (CT-3)
GST
2018 (9) TMI 1764 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – [2018] 59 G S.T.R. 54 (Mad)
MADRAS HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 17-9-2018
W. P. (MD)No. 19462 of 2018
GST
Mrs. J. Nisha Banu J.
\nFor the Petitioner : Mr.J.Selvam
\nFor the Respondents 2 to 5 : Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan
\nORDER
\nThis writ petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to forward the representation of the petitioner dated 30.07.2018 to the second respondent and to direct the second respon<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n 03.04.2018, based on which, Grievance Committee was constituted and Nodal Officers were also appointed to address the problems of taxpayers. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s. Sri Krishna Chemical Industries Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN), Goods and Service Tax Council, The Nodal Officer for State GST – Joint Commissioner of GST (CT-1), The Assistant Commissioner of GST (CT-3)GST2018 (9) TMI 1764 – MADRAS HIGH COURT – [2018] 59 G S.T.R. 54 (Mad)MADRAS HIGH … Continue reading “M\/s. Sri Krishna Chemical Industries Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN), Goods and Service Tax Council, The Nodal Officer for State GST – Joint Commissioner of GST (CT-1), The Assistant Commissioner of GST”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14154"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14154\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n5. The learned Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner has made a detailed representation, narrating all facts, dated 30.07.2018, before the jurisdictional assessing officer, namely, the fifth respondent herein, who has to forward the representation of the petitioner to the Nodal Officer, State GST, Tirunelveli \/ the fourth respondent herein.
\nHence, he confines and prays for a direction to the fifth respondent to forward the representation of the petitioner to the Nodal Officer, who, in turn, may be directed to act in accordance with the Circular, dated
\n6. In such a view of<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n