Ranjeet @ Ranjeet Singh Versus Union of India And 2 Others
GST
2018 (9) TMI 688 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 381 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 6-9-2018
Criminal misc. Bail application No. – 21843 of 2018
GST
Vivek Kumar Singh, J.
\nFor the Applicant : Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun
\nFor the Opposite Party : B.K.Singh Raghuvanshi
\nORDER
\nHon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
\nSupplementary counter affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the complainant today in the Court is taken on record.
\nHeard Sri Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.K.Singh Raghuvanshi, learned counsel for the complainant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. for State.
\nThe present bail applic<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n ed in paragraph no.4 that after follow up searches conducted so far at the premises of the buyers resulted into detection of fraudulent availment of input tax credit on the basis of fake invoices issued from the firm created, controlled and managed by applicant namely Ranjeet to the extent more than Rs. 16.57 crore. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n y No.2 as well as learned A.G.A. states that during the search several voter identity cards of different persons, Rs. 34,98,500\/- in cash, Bill Books containing different signatures, dongles, writing pad, stamps of several companies were recovered and the investigation is still in progress and the amount of tax evasion may exceed several crores. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ranjeet @ Ranjeet Singh Versus Union of India And 2 OthersGST2018 (9) TMI 688 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (17) G. S. T. L. 381 (All.)ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 6-9-2018Criminal misc. Bail application No. – 21843 of 2018 GSTVivek Kumar Singh, J. For the Applicant : Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun For the Opposite … Continue reading “Ranjeet @ Ranjeet Singh Versus Union of India And 2 Others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13686","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13686","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13686"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13686\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13686"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13686"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13686"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nThe prosecution version as narrated in the first information report is that on the basis of an information of possible evasion of service and Goods and Service Tax Act, the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Zonal Unit Meerut conducted a raid at shop No. 10 Aman Banquet, Sector-5 Rajendra Nagar, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad and found one person present in the shop\/office, who introd<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nAfter hearing the learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A., and after perusing the averments made in the present bail application as well as rejection order, this Court is of the opinion, that learned counsel for the applicant could not point out any good ground for grant of bail to the applicant.
\nAccordingly, the bail application filed on behalf of the applicant is hereby rejected.\n<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n