South Eastern Coalfields Limited Versus C.C.E. & S.T., Raipur, CGST CE &CC, Bhopal
Central Excise
2018 (9) TMI 635 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 31-7-2018
E\/56177 \u2013 56181 & 56544 \u2013 56551\/2013 [DB] – A\/52682-52694\/2018-EX[DB]
Central Excise
MR. BIJAY KUMAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) And MRS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
\nPresent for the Appellant: Mr. Hemant Bajaj & Dhruv Tiwari, Advocates
\nPresent for the Respondent: Mr. M.R. Sharma, D.R.
\nORDER
\nPER: RACHNA GUPTA
\nAll the Appeals are taken together, the issue being common to all. The appellants herein are Government of India undertaking and the wholly owned subsidiary companies of M\/s Coal India Ltd. engaged in the business of mining and sel<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n ded the same. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" South Eastern Coalfields Limited Versus C.C.E. & S.T., Raipur, CGST CE &CC, BhopalCentral Excise2018 (9) TMI 635 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMICESTAT NEW DELHI – ATDated:- 31-7-2018E\/56177 \u2013 56181 & 56544 \u2013 56551\/2013 [DB] – A\/52682-52694\/2018-EX[DB]Central ExciseMR. BIJAY KUMAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) And MRS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Present for the Appellant: Mr. Hemant Bajaj … Continue reading “South Eastern Coalfields Limited Versus C.C.E. & S.T., Raipur, CGST CE &CC, Bhopal”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13682"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13682\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n3. Since both the parties have agreed that the identical issue has come up before the Tribunal in the assessee's case – (M\/s Western Coalfields Ltd.) in Excise Appeal No. 57884, 57908 & 58595\/2013 dated 05.01.2017, where it was observed that the issue involved in the present Appeals is sub judice before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in matter of Civil Appeal No. 4056-4064 of 1999 (Mineral Area Development Vs. Steel Authority of India). Hence, a request was made that the hearing of the Appeals may be adjourned sine die with a liberty to move an application after the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 4056-4064\/1999. By considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and by following our earlier d<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n