VINOD G. MANAGING PARTNER NATIONAL MOTORS Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE) MINISTRY OF FINANCE, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE (GST WING), GST COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, NEW DELHI AND THE COMMISSIONER GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
GST
2018 (9) TMI 370 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 14 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 14-6-2018
W. P. (C) No. 17473 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
\nFor The Petitioner : ADV. SRI. MOHAN GEORGE (M-1337)
\nFor The Respondent : SRI.P.R.SREEJITH,SC,GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL AND .V.K.SHAMSUDHEEN<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n der as also the learned Standing Counsel for the fourth respondent. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" VINOD G. MANAGING PARTNER NATIONAL MOTORS Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE) MINISTRY OF FINANCE, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE (GST WING), GST COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, NEW DELHI AND THE COMMISSIONER GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMGST2018 (9) TMI 370 – KERALA … Continue reading “VINOD G. MANAGING PARTNER NATIONAL MOTORS Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE) MINISTRY OF FINANCE, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE (GST WING), GST COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERV”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13567","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13567","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13567"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13567\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13567"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13567"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13567"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nHaving regard to the facts and circumstances of this case as also the orders passed in similar matters, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition permitting the petitioner to prefer an application before the additional sixth respondent, the Nodal Officer appointed to resolve issues in the nature of one raised by the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say that if the petitioner prefers an application within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the same shall be considered by the additional sixth respondent and appropriate decision shall be taken within a week thereafter. Needless also to say that if it is found that the petiti<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n