M\/s Ujala Marketing And 2 Others Versus Union Of India And 4 Others
GST
2018 (9) TMI 369 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 45 (All)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 8-6-2018
WRIT TAX No. – 907 of 2018
GST
Mr. Pankaj Mithal and Mr. Jayant Banerji, JJ.
\nCounsel for Petitioner :- Naveen Chandra Gupta
\nCounsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Om Prakash Srivastava
\nORDER
\nHeard Shri N.C. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
\nThe petitioners are registered dealers. Their goods under transportation along with the vehicle was seized on 12.4.2018 under Section 129 of the U.P. G.S.T. Act. The seizure was challenged by the petitioners by filing a writ petition in thi<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n d where the seized goods are kept by the authorities till they are ordered to be released by the competent authority or court. The respondents cannot be keep on detaining or seizing the goods and to keep them on the road itself which may ultimately create numerous other problems. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s Ujala Marketing And 2 Others Versus Union Of India And 4 OthersGST2018 (9) TMI 369 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – [2018] 2 GSTL 45 (All)ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 8-6-2018WRIT TAX No. – 907 of 2018 GSTMr. Pankaj Mithal and Mr. Jayant Banerji, JJ. Counsel for Petitioner :- Naveen Chandra Gupta Counsel for Respondent … Continue reading “M\/s Ujala Marketing And 2 Others Versus Union Of India And 4 Others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13566","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13566","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13566"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13566\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13566"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13566"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13566"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nIn view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition with the direction to the Appellate Authority that is respondent no. 4 to decide the appeal of the petitioners in accordance with law most expeditiously if possible within a period of one month from today and to forthwith release the seized goods and vehicle of the petitioners on their furnishing security other than cash and bank guaranteed to the satisfaction of the authority concer<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n