{"id":13433,"date":"2018-06-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-06-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-06-08T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-06-07T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-hydromet-india-limited-kancheepuram-versus-commissioner-of-gst-ce-chennai-outer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=13433","title":{"rendered":"M\/s. Hydromet (India) Limited, Kancheepuram Versus Commissioner of GST &#038; CE, (Chennai Outer)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. Hydromet (India) Limited, Kancheepuram Versus Commissioner of GST &#038; CE, (Chennai Outer)<br \/>Service Tax<br \/>2018 (8) TMI 1684 &#8211; CESTAT CHENNAI &#8211; TMI<br \/>CESTAT CHENNAI &#8211; AT<br \/>Dated:- 8-6-2018<br \/>ST\/COD\/40358\/2018 in ST\/40973\/2018 &#8211; Misc Order No. 40506\/2018<br \/>Service Tax<br \/>Ms. Sulekha Beevi CS., Member (Judicial)<br \/>\nShri M. Kannan, Advocate for the Appellant<br \/>\nShri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Respondent<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nThe above application seeking condonation of delay is filed by the appellant seeking to condone the delay of 55 days in filing the appeal.<br \/>\n2. On behalf of the appellant, the Ld. Counsel, Shri M. Kannan, submitted that only when the Range Officers sought to know whether Appeal had been filed against O.I.A. No. 160\/2017 (CTA<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=366212\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. Hydromet (India) Limited, Kancheepuram Versus Commissioner of GST &#038; CE, (Chennai Outer)Service Tax2018 (8) TMI 1684 &#8211; CESTAT CHENNAI &#8211; TMICESTAT CHENNAI &#8211; ATDated:- 8-6-2018ST\/COD\/40358\/2018 in ST\/40973\/2018 &#8211; Misc Order No. 40506\/2018Service TaxMs. Sulekha Beevi CS., Member (Judicial) Shri M. Kannan, Advocate for the Appellant Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=13433\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s. Hydromet (India) Limited, Kancheepuram Versus Commissioner of GST &#038; CE, (Chennai Outer)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13433","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13433","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13433"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13433\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}